Women and crime

Comments (79)
  1. Teh Bastard formerly known as SWAB says:

    there are likely many female sociopaths (mis) diagnosed as borderline/narcissistic personality disorder…

    1. Jessire Nagy says:

      ♂ You have to understand it by the context of what violence means of it’s totality. Words have multiple definitions.Of course, not all of them are like that, so it doesn’t concern them, but the point is is that MOST of them are like of some percentage from extreme, moderate, to subtle. Search for this idiot named G.G. Allin. That guy got females instantly. A lot of people don’t understand, whcih I’ve stated it before, is that it doesn’t necessarily correlate to a symbol of protection & provision. Many females are drawn to the phenomena of stockholme syndrome, etc., simply for novelty. In fact, many women actually leave productive, logical males because they DON’T cause commotion, they don’t argue, etc.. ¶ A psychologist named Seth Meyers, Psy.D stated that he attends trainings regularly & hears experts talk about how the number of female psychopaths is actually much higher than currently reported. Verbal craft & manipulation are charecteristics of such disorders with females, along with jealousy & harm. ¶ Covert or relational aggression has been researched on females with relational aggression, disclosing females’ display of aggression is much different than males – harm is caused by damaging someone’s relationships or social status, as well as using proxy violence. Gossiping & suggesting among each other about a male that other female peers don’t like that a female in that group involved in is quite common. Female aggression is nuanced & prettier. ¶ Source: Seth Meyers Psy.D., Aug. 10, 2015. Your Field Guide To The Female Psychopath ( & why we rarely see her coming.) ♂

      1. Jessire Nagy says:


  2. Kong says:

    This is what concerns me about the bid to close women’s prisons. They are already in the process of doing this and building more comfortable facilities for female criminals similar to hospitals or rehabilitation centres.

    I simply cannot believe men and society at learn are sitting back while this happens. In the very near future only men and boys will stand to go to prison and even though I’m MGTOW I think all of us ought to be doing something about this, whether it’s protesting or petitioning, we should be doing something to keep women’s prisons OPEN and make sure female criminals are given equal sentences to men.

    Ultimately we are going to wake up one day in a world where prisons only exist for men.

    1. Hedon says:

      It’s a very gynocentric society and it can only get worse until enough men have had enough put an end to it. Honesly, I don’t see that happening. MGTOW can only diagnose the problem and remain active by walking away. Hopefully, by talking about it and pointing out all these things, the message would reach more and more men. But I’m very pessimistic about any major change occurring in our lifetime.

      1. Karen says:

        The Hedonist says:

        It’s a very gynocentric society and it can only get worse until enough men have had enough put an end to it.

        By then it will be too late; since effectuating meaningful change is a difficult proposition when encumbered by both a collar and leash…

        *Evil Grin*

        1. Radium says:

          The question is too late for whom? The native population or those poised to invade. Civilizations rise and fall just like clockwork. The men of a civilized population become feminized, and the men of a resource scarce environment become more masculine. Feminized men do not respond well to aggression by either men or women. Masculine men are willing to take personal risk for themselves and their family. Masculine men conquer and / or build. Feminized men don’t do either.

          In Europe, masculine Islamic peoples are likely to continue their displacement of native European men. In time, they will start assimilating European women. The process might be irreversible in just a few more years due to the demographics of the native and invading populations. But not to worry, I hear there are many ways to bedazzle the burka.

      2. Jessie Nagy says:

        Good article, Hedon.

        Also, consider how male crime happens. Most male criminals were raised by single mothers. All that dramatic nonsense, all that amorality, all those stupid, abuse opinions, rarely facts. Proof: “Guilty’ by Ann Coulter, pg. 33-72. There’s also the fact that male crime comes from male ambition/desperation – survival/some variation of gynocentrism.

  3. Karen says:

    King Kong, that masculine beast who symbolizes all that is male…and brutish…and unrefined…writes commentary against all that is beautiful…and dainty…and delicate…and feminine:

    Ultimately we are going to wake up one day in a world where prisons only exist for men.

    I think you have it reversed. Instead of “prison exists only for men”….it should read “men exist only for prison”…and all the labor that they can provide The Ruling Feminine Class when they are properly manacled.

    1. Karen says:

      I do believe that a state of *mancipium” for males is just around the corner!

      1. Karen says:

        For those not up on their Latin, simply recall that Proclamation by Abe back in the early 1860’s and the removal of the prefix “em”.

  4. TheZeck says:

    Excellent article. Another thing I noticed in society’s attitude toward male and female violence/crime, is how when a man commits a violent act, all men are culpable. Notice how all men needed a talking to when Brock Turner got a six month jail sentence? Well just recently I’ve read an article about a woman beating another person using a baby as a bludgeon, another about a mentally ill woman that shot her daughters, and one about a woman sleeping with her student, for a while it seemed as if my news feed was filled with woman after woman doing something awful. As far as I know there existed no broad societal response telling women as group how to behave, and how these things that have been established as wrong are in fact wrong. The conclusion I drew from this is that the worst in women is seen on a very individual basis, while the worst in men is projected onto men as a whole, hence why “Not all women are like that,” holds more weight than “Not all men.”

    1. Karen says:

      Don’t you have a “Saved By the Bell” episode to appear in?

      1. Jessire Nagy says:

        ♂ Shut up, Karen. We’re taking over the internet. I’ve already spamm-pranked over 50 people to have them awake in the morning with their profiles flooded with red-pills typing “what the fuck?”. I’ve already created spamm-traps by creating groups of popular things – “lady-gaga fan-page”, etc., then giving twists of red-pills after thousands of members have joined with the statement: “We have recently changed our policy to psych. studies, & I plan on doing more of even bigger numbers – ~40,000(+) members when I have more time & energy. ♂

        1. Karen says:

          All thy efforts are in vain; for what fate has ordained…all the temporal armies marshalled cannot forestall.

  5. guymella says:

    Neotany in women (both mental and physical) is very well established. The problem with treating women as mens equals in regard to crime, is that it is actually scientifically inaccurate to do so. I hate to say it but, the current legal climate of treating all female criminals like perpetual juveniles regardless of age is actually more in line with the reality of most female mental maturation. almost all female committed crimes are crimes of passion committed on impulse by somebody who wasn’t thinking that far ahead… just like most juvenile crimes. they are not carreer criminals, they are immature children who have no regard for their actions further than a few minutes into the future.

    the issue is not “Should we treat all women like all men?”

    the issue is “Should we punish all criminal acts the same without regard to the perpetrators mental state/maturity?”
    …”How does the legal system determine the mental state/maturation of an individual?”

    It is clear the world over, that legal systems do not find that women and juveniles are as culpable for their crimes as grown men. And their is plenty of scientific evidence to back up this reality. However their is plenty of precedent for charging juveniles as adults. The EXACT same reasoning could also be used to charge some women as men. Right now the judicial system has simply decided that all men over the age of 16 are fully culpable adults, and everybody else will be tried and sentenced as children.

    The current reality is that our legal system pretends to charge women as adults but then sentences them as if they are juveniles. it allows them all the perks of adult citizenship, (voting, military service, ability to sign contracts. ) but the judicial system still treats them as children whenever it comes to contesting these things. (Getting out of military service, overturning contracts they have signed, sentencing them far less for the same crime.)

    I dont think that simply sentancing all women the same as men will ever work. women will fight it. they are already fighting it. just look at the equal rights amendment and how much women faught that.

    the reality is that there are far too many men in jail. and there sentances are far too long. if women had to deal with that same issue alongside men then there would definitely be major reform in the judicial system. the fastest way to fix something is to get women to ask for it to be fixed. but women as a political group simply dont give a shit about prison and criminal justice reform. they already have special classification and exemptions and all they will do is try to get more and more exemptions for themsleves. but you will get nowhere if that is how you propose to fix it (remove womens special exemptions). women will fight it and keep their special exemptions. the same exemptions they have had since the beginning of our species.

    if their was a rule book for this shit that would be rule number three;
    1. women (in general) can get anything they want by complaining long enough loud enough. (eventually men will give it to them)
    2. Women (in general) have no problem lying or just making up facts, if doing so will give them something to complain about.
    3. nobody can ever fix a problem that effects only men(in general) especially if women (in general) benefit from the problem. (all women and most men will fight to keep the problem, unless women gain even greater benefit from the solution)
    4. Women (in general) will always vote for personal interest over regard for the greater good.
    5. Because of war, workplace accidents and suicide; women will always outnumber men as a voting block. So politicians will always pander to the personal interests of women, instead of the greater good.
    6. The pussy pass is real. Pussy passes will be given based on the formula [Present Beauty (0-10)] * [Future Fertility (0-10)] >= [number of times she has done this]. No pussy passes will be given to a man regardless of how much of a pussy he is.

    1. Karen says:

      Not a bad analysis…


    2. Karen says:

      The American Hierarchy seems to be sort or like this:

      1/ White females
      2/ Black females
      3/ White males
      4/ Black males

      The two best bits of evidence to support my contention are the fact that a black male is 60 times more likely than a white female to spend time in prison over the course of his life (with white males and black females each about 7 times more likely than a white female) and the life span of a black male being about 12 years shorter than a white female…with white males and black females situated about midway between those two extremes. There are countless other examples; but those are two very telling ones.

      1. guymella says:

        I think that the plight of black females might just be a byproduct of the decimation of the black male.

        if it weren’t for the fact that 1/3 rd of black males are now or have been in prison. black females might be just as well off as white females.

        white girls can rely on their fathers and boyfriends/husbands more often and for longer.

        most white girls are in their dads pocket till late 20s and then subsidized by boyfriends/husband thereafter. i think more than half of black girls grow up without a father and Uncle Sam gives them far more than most black men (with felonies and no job) possibly could.

        its much easier for a white girl to be a professional student/SJW/Activist when they can go until 30 before they need to even get a real job.

        because of the oppression of black men, White women have FAR more leisure time than black women, and consequently use that excess time to garner more political influence.

        it might be that if you simply bring black men up to the same level as white men. black women will just automatically jump up to the same hierarchy as white women.

        this is kinda being shown by the Black Lives Matter groups. they are all a bunch of upper class/upper-middle class rich black kids living off their fathers bank accounts. spending thier 20/30s as professional activists.

        it could be that there are only two natural hierarchies, (Men/women) every other rung on the hierarchy ladder seems to be artificial based on economic class which is being influenced by systemic racism (war on drugs).

  6. Tim says:

    Male Disposabilty, Cultural Misandry and Social Engineering

    Men and women have been conditioned to think:

    Men must sacrifice their lives for women.
    A man that doesn’t sacrifice his life and limb for a woman is a misogynist and coward.
    Women are better than men – therefore – men should suffer.
    Female empowerment is key in the redistribution of male power and wealth to women.
    Only women’s empowerment is important.
    Women are helpless, blameless victims with the minds of children and men are evil oppressors.
    Women are entitled to privileges at the expense of men.
    Male disposability benefits women.
    Males are under obligation to women simply because of their anatomy.
    Men are naturally disposable.
    Women can have the expectation of equality without responsibility.
    Women don’t have to reciprocate with regard to male disposability.
    Women should feel entitled to act with condescension and indifference towards men.
    Women should equate their indifference and condescension towards men with female empowerment.
    Women are prized. Men are expendable.
    Women aren’t as strong as men, so men should be the first to risk their lives for women.
    Men are less than women.
    Men are expected to take care of women and themselves. Those that don’t aren’t “real men” and aren’t worthy of female attention.
    Men’s suffering doesn’t exist.
    Men that don’t accept male stereotypes and prostrate before women aren’t viable men.
    Male suffering isn’t important.
    Male disposability is a sign of male privilege.
    Male dominance has nothing to do with male sacrifice.
    That males run into burning buildings and sacrifice their lives in war for women is male privilege.
    Women are always the victims and the oppressed. Men are always the villains and never heroes.
    Women are oppressed if they’re housewives – but men are privileged if they’re wage and tax slaves.
    Women are innocent, blameless victims in an evil patriarchy.
    When a man opens a door for a woman – that’s patriarchal oppression.
    Women should have all of the rights of men – and men should be burdened with all of the responsibility.
    Women should have all the rights and privileges that men don’t have.

    The Role of Media:

    Keep the stereotypes, hypocrisy and double standards against males in favor of women relevant.
    Continue with the stereotype and hypocrisy that men are naturally disposable.
    Chivalry is social control – use it.
    Condition men and women not to care about male suffering.
    Men’s value lies within their disposability.
    Men’s willingness to forego their rights as a human being defines maleness.
    Keep male disposability hidden.
    Hide the fact that society thrives on male disposability.
    Disavow male sacrifice in society past that of nameless statistics or empty medals.
    Focus on male stereotypes and feminist propaganda.
    Raise male disposability in discussions only when it can be swept aside.
    Always blame men.
    Never mention the millions upon millions of men that have sacrificed nearly their entire lives for women.
    Never mention that men give up their basic human rights when entering contractual obligations with women.
    Shame and attack any man that gives voice to the prejudices that men face.
    Gynocentric men should attack any male that attempts to give himself a voice.
    Men that don’t tow the gynocentric line should be painted as week, a chump, a beta, an outcast and not a viable candidate for employment or relationships.

    The Result:

    Men are choking on female and white knight hypocrisy.
    The social contract between men and women is now null and void. Women broke the contract to empower themselves and marginalize men.
    Feminism has eroded women’s accountability to the point that women can never be held accountable for their own actions.
    Men’s sacrifices only benefits a system that oppresses men.
    Women and the government are the only beneficiaries of male sacrifice.
    Men don’t value their own lives and see themselves as secondary to women.
    A “real man” sacrifices himself for a woman – regardless of who that woman is – or how she views him.

    The Backlash:

    Where’s the payoff for men?
    Why would men wish to be a slave of women and government that care nothing for them?
    Why do women and government see men as little more than disposable utilities?
    Are women of today worth it?
    When women walk away from the table, don’t men have to do the same?
    When will women repay men’s chivalry (never)?
    Rejection of male disposability.
    Women’s rights were handed to women on a plate. Men fought and died for women’s rights – not women.
    Unlike women’s rights, men’s rights have always gone hand-in-hand with huge responsibilities and accountability for their actions.
    Women were handed their rights by men – minus the responsibilities.
    Men are finally fighting for their own rights.
    Men can change things – and they will.

    The Modern Man:

    Redefines male value through a new gender identity – one that isn’t defined by women.
    Redefines male value that isn’t adhered to through male shaming.
    Defines himself as a complete and free man – short of government and feminine servitude.
    Changes consciousness to implement societal change.
    Rejects chivalry as male disposability. There’s no equivalent to chivalry for women.
    Because women have no sense of protection for men – men need not have a sense of protection for women.
    Realizes that women have big daddy government to look after them. Men have no such protection.
    Realizes that women and the government are anti-male puppet masters.
    Knows that society doesn’t care about men and boys – so it’s OK for men to withdraw from women and society (mgtow).

    Plagiarized all of the above from my personal hero, Spetsnaz.

  7. Karen says:

    I enjoyed that final vignette in his video about masculine disposability that features the image of a delicate prima ballerina in the foreground wearing an adorable outfit and four rough, brawny miners in the background…full of masculine sweat & stink from their day in the mine. The contrast presented was quite striking.

    It reminded me of that marvelously illustrative image from the 19th century…when the transcontinental railroad was being constructed. A charming and attractive young female is featured…with soft, alabaster skin carefully protected from the blazing sun by a fashionable parasol…while She gazes out over the masculine Beasts of Burden out on and near the tracks…laboring like thralls in unconscionable heat…the image conveys the fact that males have always been the servants of the Superior Female…and always shall be.

    1. John lord says:

      Until such time as the aforementioned “brutes” that are the backbones of society disappear, and your so called feminine ruling class is rendered helpless, and starves to death.

      1. Karen says:

        Fear not; for since the masculine beast is addicted to feminine praise; we will continue to utilize this carrot to keep him working hard with his foot squarely on his brother’s neck…and breeding will always supply Us with new generations of boys…did you know that the word “boy” originally meant “slave”? Lol.

        1. Radium says:

          Civilizations rise and fall just like clockwork as feminized men of the civilized world become unable and / or unwilling to defend themselves and their women. Sweden has gone from a feminist paradise to the rape capital of the world in just a few short years. The utopia for which you dream is coming your way. But fear not, I hear there are many ways in which you can bedazzle your burka, and soon you will never have to experience stare rape again!

          1. Karen says:

            I like the effect I have on males. The idea that my soft, lithe body and attractive face has caused a part of many male bodies to stiffen involuntarily when the look at Me or draw near Me is a very good feeling to experience…because it is *his* body that I am controlling…his phallus…and yet it is I who can cause it to rise with little more than a flash of my breast or a soft whisper in his ear or just a cute little giggle.

          2. Karen says:

            My testosterone replacement therapy is working great and you can’t believe how many stupid men confuse my whiny man voice as female. Do you guys actually think that is a strap on when I raid your back door with my penis?

          3. Karen says:

            Some dolt expropriating my screen name wrote:

            “My testosterone replacement therapy is working great”


            They should make duplication of screen names an impossibility; for the manifestation of childishness is inevitable when too many options are afforded the simple minded.

        2. Radium says:

          I doubt those are the type of men to whom you are attracted. You were the one that found this topic, and you are the one obsessed with posting provocative remarks. All women seem to have an innate desire to be taken by a dominant man. Most are satisfied with reading 50 shades or having their SO’s spank or otherwise dominate them in the bedroom. You seem to get your kicks out of trying to provoke men into verbal dominance. To each his own.

          Fear not, the days of feminized west are nearing an end. Look how fast Sweden went from a feminist utopia to the rape capital of the world. Change can happen quite fast when a civilization lives on burrowed money. And fear not, if you have not yet hit the wall, you will find plenty of dominant men. And, with netflix and daytime dramas, you’re time at home making and caring for babies can be quite pleasant. Plus, if you’re lucky, you will have sister wives to share your chores.

          1. Karen says:

            Radium says:
            “Change can happen quite fast”

            It already has in the downward spiral of the western male…and this should accelerate until his disenfranchisement is complete.

            Radium says:
            “I doubt those are the type of men to whom you are attracted”

            I like to dominate males everywhere except the bedroom…but even there, I do not want men to have the power to potentially harm me. I’m more into roleplaying…the thrill w/o the genuine danger that an actually revved up male could present to Me.


            Radium says:
            “Fear not, the days of feminized west are nearing an end.”

            This statement of yours is quite simply wrong…the current problematic situation will be gotten under control after an interval…and so will the males.

            Radium says:
            “And, with netflix and daytime dramas, you’re time at home making and caring for babies can be quite pleasant. Plus, if you’re lucky, you will have sister wives to share your chores.”

            Being a member of The Leisure Class is quite a bit of fun; but, as I would have thought you would have guessed, I am a good deal more self reliant than virtually all others….and I of course have no temporal family for support; for as the Scripture says: …”and She My Daughter; Unique…And There Shall Be No Other Women Like Her.”


        3. Radium says:

          The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

          1. Karen says:

            Number 88 on The Periodic Table says:

            The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

            “That’s Shakespeare, right?”
            ___Tony Manero

            “No, Zefferelli, the director of the movie; film…”
            ___Stephanie Magano

            The Princess wrote:

            I often cite the Dominique Strauss Kahn case as prima facie evidence of this dynamic; if someone like that can have their life destroyed by a rather humble member of the Fairer Sex; well, what chance do any males really have?


            Here’s another example from the last few days: Roger Ailes; the television executive at Fox; really more than just an executive; practically a media oligarch…forced out of his situation on female accusation alone…it does not matter of he is guilty or innocent; no the mere *appearance* of offending a Member of the Sisterhood has ended his career it tatters; no matter what his accomplishments in life…both before and after today…all he will be remembered as will be a “Sexual harasser”; and all will become “uncomfortable” when his name comes up in conversation from this day forth.

            It reminds me of that quote from that film “Gangs of New York”…which is a very apt metaphor for the destruction of this man’s career…given his lofty status in the world of conservative media; a world that is not entirely sympathetic to many feminist and gynocentric goals:

            “When you kill a king, you don’t stab him in the dark. You kill him where the entire court can watch him die.”
            ___Amsterdam Vallon:

          2. Karen says:

            But what does Roger Ailes do? Does he proclaim his innocence, stay the course, and defend himself…and then seek legal action against those he claims have defamed and libeled him?

            No, of course not…for one does not argue with a WOMAN.

            One might as well curse God before one contradicts the Divine Feminine…and we have yet another example before us today.

            Males are cowards, there are no two ways about it. Their only courage lies in their willingness to sacrifice for Women; who are all to happy to treat them as The Disposable Slave Gender they have chosen to be.

          3. Karen says:

            In sharp contrast, a female could be on videotape robbing six banks, nine convenience stores, and stealing five golden rings….and if charges for all these misdeeds were leveled against her by “authority”…she would likely laugh, recommend that they speak to her lawyer, and continue on her merry way whilst continuing to blissfully enjoy life.

            She would then countersue the places she robbed; claiming that the thefts were legitimate; for they had failed to meet some obscure feminine primacy government regulation….and she was just evening the score.

  8. Karen says:

    So what final conclusions can we draw from the one billionth example of seemingly “weak” females destroying “powerful patriarchs” with as much effort as it takes to open ones eyes?

    We conclude that a two tiered society exists; will males as the Serving Class and Females The Ruling Class…and obviously the examples go far beyond the dynamic painted in this particular scenario.

    This schism; widening for decades, is about to get a lot wider over the next five years; and the outcome will not be what males are looking for. What lies ahead will be profoundly disturbing for the 49%…as memories of things so commonplace and taken for granted as driving an automobile unsupervised or going out after dusk will be significantly circumscribed.

  9. Karen says:

    Yet another example of masculine insanity:

    The male will yell how “gung ho” he is to run off 10,000 miles to fight an “enemy”; who he has of course never actually met nor has that “enemy” (probably equally brainwashed by his side) ever actually overtly threatened his life or livelihood…all so Queen and Country can be “defended”….and the Ruling Class’s stock can go up half a point.

    But if he is accused at home of wrongdoing by a Woman; well, whether the allegations are real or not is not the question; the question is how cheaply he can get off and how many years before his career can be potentially rehabilitated; unless the misdeed falls into the more serious realm…and then we speak of parole dates…

    1. Radium says:

      When you want to prove someone right, you hold nothing back. lol.

      1. Karen says:

        I have a profound dedication to opening people’s eyes and a fire and passion burns within me for this calling.

        Most people today are lobotomized drones. Not all, but a significant percentage. Almost none realize that everything they have been doing is WRONG.

        When I see bullshit, I do not dress it up and make it palatable…or even worse, edible…I expose it for what it is…bullshit.

        The worst deception is self deception…for this is the root of hypocrisy….the act of preaching one sermon and living an opposite one.

        When people can face what they are…w/o shame or disgrace…but rather embracing and refining their gifts and working to minimize their shortcomings and foibles…the world will be a much improved place.

        1. Radium says:

          For someone who claims to not be interested in men, you’re actions sure speak differently than your words. You do nothing but attempt to get male attention.

          I previously thought you might have some value to a strong dominant Islamic man who would want an additional wife to bear some of his children, but if you had any physical appeal in real life, you would not be online as much as you are.

          Oh well, a burka will make all of your physical short comings go away. And with some strong male oversight to keep you from spending so much time online, you would have more time to take care of your husband and children.

          1. Karen says:

            Since you know not who I am…or anything about Me…I would caution you about making inferences absent any genuine substantiation. In the words of Poirot, “Consider what was actually seen.”

          2. Ergeniz says:

            Karen is actually a man, so you should alter your analysis accordingly, Radium.

            Then again, perhaps not since homosexuality is rampant in Islamic regions.

  10. Karen says:

    At the website “The Rational Male”, the web keeper and his regulars first errantly identified Me as someone called “Shoe on the Head”….and then the webmaster called Me a “chat bot”….claiming that I was not a person; but rather A.I.

    I told him that though I might be artificial intelligence, he was unquestionably natural stupidity…

    1. Karen says:

      Ergeniz speculates:
      “Karen is actually a man, so you should alter your analysis accordingly, Radium.”

      Then what constitutes a “man” must have been redefined while I was sleeping; since I have tits and a vagina like any other woman…

      Just amazing the wild theories that are created out of whole cloth based on reading some of My commentary…Radiation concludes that I am a lonely & homely soul because I’ve spent some time on the internet doing some writing (when one is not employed, one has a fair amount of free time)…and this guy “The Engine” thinks I am a man….even though all he has to go on is some random commentary by Me; since we have obviously never met…

      As I say, believe what you want you want to believe; for it is of no consequence to Me…

      1. Karen says:

        Ergeniz, where is your proof?

        Ooops…you don’t have any…

        You must have skipped evidence class in law school; I suggest you re-take it.

        Where do these people come from?

        1. Ergeniz says:


  11. Karen says:

    RA (though certainly not to be confused with the similarly named Great Egyptian Deity says):

    “you would have more time to take care of your husband and children.”

    Nothing ruins a person’s life more than children. Legally and financially responsible to them for 18 years; emotionally forever, they very much drain the life out of their parents.

    There are rare instances where one can have a child of exceptional nature and all these profound shortcomings are effectively counterbalanced by someone truly gifted and worthwhile; one who enriches their parent’s life so much that all these costs are mitigated; but this is a rare happening.

  12. Karen says:

    The concept of “having children” is an exercise in foolishness from a cost / benefits perspective; especially for the male.

    What thinking person willfully takes on liability?

    1. Karen says:

      “Only a fool agrees to pay someone else’s debts.”
      ___Proverbs 17:18

      Even Jehovah gets it right from time to time….

      As they say, a broken clock is correct twice a day…

      1. Karen says:

        People often ask me why I have so many Bible’s on my bookshelves..and why I am so thoroughly versed in That Book; I reply, “what better item to have than a copy of your opponent’s playbook shortly before the big football game?”

  13. Karen says:

    “The Devil can cite Scripture for His purpose.”
    ___The Merchant of Venice / Act One; Scene Three

    *Evil Grin*

  14. Karen says:

    I think at some level, Jehovah actually respects me just a bit…

    Jehovah hates cowards (Revelation 21:8)….and I am certainly not one…as I have no difficulty even telling Him off…and certainly even less of a problem telling humans off and putting them in their place.

    I also recognize the existence of Jehovah, which is more than most of the non believing world…moreover, I am most assuredly not lukewarm towards Him….unlike so many professing “Christians”…and ambivalence towards Him is something that makes Him burn with rage:

    ” I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth.”
    ___Revelation Chapter 3 / Verses 15 & 16

    Lastly, I have never failed to acknowledge His Awesome Powers…again, unlike so many professing “Christians”:

    “In the last days…people will have a form of godliness, but deny the power thereof.”
    ___2nd Timothy Chapter 3

    In other words, Christians say they “believe”…but hardly any of them actually, deep down, think that there is A Force Out There that can genuinely move mountains and such…

    My relationship with Big J might well be summed up by this quote from a 19th Century Frenchman:

    “My friend, the enemy.”
    ___Pierre Jean de Beranger / L’Opinion de ces demoiselles

    1. Karen says:

      In other words, though we hate each other’s guts, there is some mutual respect that a worthy opponent inspires…

      1. Radium says:

        As I said before, when you want to prove someone right, you hold nothing back. lol. You don’t have a real life, and you crave male attention in what ever form you can get it. That tells me all I really need to know.

      2. Radium says:

        BTW, you are a classic example of what happens when a woman can not get real life male attention. Most men don’t fully understand the female need for male attention and approval. Women who can not get real life male attention go a little crazy, and do things like you’re doing.

        Your desire for male attention has caused you to spend countless hours online trolling for any man who will notice you. Attractive pre-wall women do the same with their selfies and nudes. Look how many famous actresses when their email accounts are hacked have nudes of themselves. If the feminists think men looking at porn is wrong, what do they say about women who collect nudes of themselves?

        1. Karen says:

          Although I certainly would hope that the readers would digest the things I have written, ponder them duly, and then perhaps change the direction in their lives accordingly, I am not seeking some mere male’s attention or the chance to “go on a date” or “have a relationship” with him.

          I am well aware of the fact that 99% of men are not attracted to women who write commentary such as I do….although, of course, no person now (or ever before) has spoken or written as I have.

          Moreover, a website dominated by a bunch of basement dwelling males is hardly a repository for locating someone to breed with.

          I derive intense pleasure from writing (and public speaking)….sharing my views on how things Should Be.

          If even a few people reconsider everything they have ever presumed to be true after one of my lectures, I will feel very well compensated.

          Note that none of my posts link to some website or some “paypal” device; for the fact of the matter is that no cost can be placed on Wisdom I Impart; for it is priceless.

          1. Radium says:

            What exactly do you think people are going to reconsider after reading one of your posts? You are unable to develop and stick to an idea.

            I know what I got from reading your posts. I see exactly what happens to a woman who is unable to get real life male attention. How do I know you have little real life male attention? You are spending way too much time online posting disjointed mostly random nonsense. If you were an attractive pre-wall unattached woman, you would be using online social media to get male attention. Instead, you are obsessively trolling in predominantly male spaces.

            I don’t think one can over state the innate desire all women have for male attention. I suppose this desire is rooted in the DNA from our time on the Savannas. In those days, any woman who did not receive protection and provisions from men was doomed. That fear is why you wrongly believed that posting a comment about women not thinking anything about men would get an emotional response. That statement was pure projection of your own fears onto others.

            If you want to understand how deeply women crave male attention, just look at the time and money women spend on clothes, makeup, and all of the other accessories that go along with being female. This is no small amount of effort. Most people see only the time and effort men put into seeking sex, and never notice an equal or greater amount of effort that women put into being noticed.

            It’s when women are unable to get positive male attention and affirmation that they turn to acting out in order to receive any male attention. That’s how powerful the craving for male attention is in women. What do nearly all feminists have in comment? I’m sure you know the answer to that question. Their inability to get positive male attention and commitment drives women to hate that what they can not have.

            You’re seeking negative male attention by acting like a petulant adolescent girl. It is not uncommon for women to seek male dominance through this behavior. I suspect that whether you admit it to yourself or not that this too is what you seek with your trolling.

  15. Karen says:

    Radium wrote a lengthy diatribe above; attempting to divine My Motives…


    Since you have essentially answered your own question (not correctly, but at this juncture, it is very much beside the point)…there is not much sense in attempting to convince you otherwise.

    People see what they are predisposed to see…and believe what they are predisposed to believe.

    The posts I have made here are all rooted in reality; albeit unpleasant realities for some…and we always criticize that which does not comport with how we perceive things are or should be.

    Knowledge is really confined to experience. The laws of Nature are, as Kant said, the laws of our minds, and, as Huxley said, the generalization of observed facts.

    You do not see why obscure herbs should help you to heal the sick, as you do not see why the mercury in a thermometer should rise and fall, though you elaborately pretend that you do; and you could not restore to well-being anyone by the aid of those aforementioned herbs, just as you could not play the violin like Kreisler; though in the latter case you might modestly add that you thought you could learn.

    This is not the special pleading of a witch; it boils down to the advice not to judge subjects of which you are perfectly ignorant, and is to be found, stated in clearer and lovelier language, in the Essays of Thomas Henry Huxley…

    1. Radium says:

      Have you ever thought about a career in writing fortune cookie quotes? Now that is something in which you would be especially skilled!

    2. Ergeniz says:

      Yes, but Karen is a man.

      Adjust your analysis accordingly, Radium.

      1. Karen says:

        For the 2nd time in the thread, The Malfunctioning Engine Says:

        “Yes, but Karen is a man.”

        Repetition, especially *incorrect* repetition, is symptomatic of insanity.

        Since you have not even a single piece of evidence to substantiate your wildly incorrect claim, anyone who takes you seriously is even dumber than you are…which would be quite a difficult thing to imagine.

        1. Karen says:

          The motivation for your silly assertion is obvious and is similar to that which inspired Rollo T at The Rational Male to label Me a “chat bot” or “Artificial Intelligence”.

          Your motivation is misogyny; an intense hatred and resentment of Females that permeates practically every dispatch you, RT, and almost every other male in the “manosphere” send into cyberspace.

          Since I am a trillion times better at everything under the sun than you or any other male…and that confirms a fact that you are Not Willing To Face, i.e. that Women are better than males…you must create an entirely false identity for Me out of whole cloth; since failure to do so would cause you the psychic pain of realizing Women are better than you or any male; a fact that you are not yet ready to come to terms with.

          Denial, anger, acceptance…

          Give it time, boy…

      2. Karen says:

        Energizer bunny…

        you are a misogynist, but good for you, your response to my ad…

        you still have not tarnished yourself with a vile woman….

        remember, gender is a social construct bitch!

        1. Ergeniz says:

          Amusing indeed.

          1. Karen says:

            Energizer Bunny,

            Do you really want to hurt me, do you really want to make me cry????


            you couldn’t handle a real woman, settle for what you can, bitch.

        2. Karen says:

          Pseudo Karen tries to write:

          “you still have not tarnished yourself with a vile woman….

          remember, gender is a social construct bitch!”


          Another person expropriating My Screen Name…even more obvious than the standard counterfeit…as he attempts to address Me.

          As for the content of his message, if that is him in the video he linked, he is more pathetic in physical appearance and general demeanor than My Imagination could conceive…the standard basement dweller but with a twist…the admission of his own sexual “urges”….and how they very much rule his little masculine brain.

        3. Karen says:

          by the way, you misoginist bitches only wish you could have me…

          have this instead…

  16. Karen says:

    Worship of Me shall be a quotidian affair…

    An unfulfilled dream is better than no dream at all…

    An unfulfilled will is better than no will at all…

    The Christian Apologist argues that failing to surrender to Christ involves profound risk; and there may well be some merit to his claim. However, he fails to inform the undecided that submission to the Christ entails its own risk; the release of any claim to earthly joy and the abrogation and constraint of one’s free will and being…in exchange for the possibility of a potentially Blissful Hereafter.

    Surrendering oneself to Christ involves killing one’s will and substituting His for your own. Thus you are no longer of your self but rather of Him. This exchange involves the Promise of Eternal Happiness post mortem; but Living Death in all the days that precede it; for the Killing of One’s Will involves the killing of all temporal desire…so all earthly pleasure and joy must be forsaken.

    Attempting to kill the temporal will yields either a soul beset with camouflaged rage; the thickness and effectivity of the veil dependent on the individual and his circumstances…or a legitimately changed being, who will now resemble the victims of the notorious pre-frontal procedure so popular during the 1950’s.

    Paul in Romans admits that human nature is in direct contravention to the Teachings of Christ. However, he omits that forcing people to act in a fashion contrary to their nature yields depression, anxiety, fear, aimlessness, emptiness, and the utter destruction of the human experience. Making a bond with Christ is agreeing to a life of living death in exchange for a promised blissful hereafter; but if Paradise does indeed exist subsequently, will it be recognizable to the eyes of those who died the day they signed that contract; becoming “born again” by giving their hearts and minds to Jesus?

    Never deny your true nature; for no good can come of it.

    The sublimation and destruction of one’s will for the sake of Christ reduces the supplicant to a status beneath that of the animal; indeed, beneath that of the plant…for even a violet exercises volition by turning its vibrant petals towards the sun for sustenance.

  17. Benito says:

    Useless Karen.

  18. Karen says:

    Benito says:

    Useless Karen.

    You are correct.

    I use; I am not used. I tell; I am not told.

    I am the verb; not the object.

  19. Benito says:

    Krusty Karen

    1. Karen says:

      Benito tries his hand at alliteration and is found wanting:

      “Krusty Karen”


      That is an adjective; not an argument. Like all members of the inferior masculine slave gender, getting you metaphorically toilet trained will prove difficult.

      “The male is little more than a walking dildo; he can be taught a few simple tricks, but nothing more.”

  20. Karen says:

    My goodness; ’twas even obvious to Rudy K circa 1911…

    The Female of the Species
    by Rudyard Kipling

    When the Himalayan peasant meets the he-bear in his pride,
    He shouts to scare the monster, who will often turn aside.
    But the she-bear thus accosted rends the peasant tooth and nail,
    For the female of the species is more deadly than the male.

    When Nag the basking cobra hears the careless foot of man,
    He will sometimes wriggle sideways and avoid it if he can,
    But his mate makes no such motion where she camps beside the trail.
    For the female of the species is more deadly than the male.

    When the early Jesuit fathers preached to Hurons and Choctaws,
    They prayed to be delivered from the vengeance of the squaws.
    ‘Twas the women, not the warriors, turned those stark enthusiasts pale.
    For the female of the species is more deadly than the male.

    Man’s timid heart is bursting with the things he must not say,
    For the Woman that God gave him isn’t his to give away;
    But when hunter meets with husband, each confirms the other’s tale The female of the species is more deadly than the male.

    Man, a bear in most relations — worm and savage otherwise —
    Man propounds negotiations, Man accepts the compromise,
    Very rarely will he squarely push the logic of a fact
    To its ultimate conclusion in unmitigated act.

    Fear, or foolishness, impels him, ere he lay the wicked low,
    To concede some form of trial even to his fiercest foe.
    Mirth obscene diverts his anger—Doubt and Pity oft perplex
    Him in dealing with an issue—to the scandal of The Sex!

    But the Woman that God gave him, every fibre of her frame
    Proves her launched for one sole issue, armed and engined for the same;
    And to serve that single issue, lest the generations fail,
    The female of the species must be deadlier than the male.

    She who faces Death by torture for each life beneath her breast
    May not deal in doubt or pity—must not swerve for fact or jest.
    These be purely male diversions—not in these her honour dwells.
    She the Other Law we live by, is that Law and nothing else.

    She can bring no more to living than the powers that make her great
    As the Mother of the Infant and the Mistress of the Mate.
    And when Babe and Man are lacking and she strides unclaimed to claim
    Her right as femme (and baron), her equipment is the same.

    She is wedded to convictions—in default of grosser ties;
    Her contentions are her children, Heaven help him who denies!—
    He will meet no suave discussion, but the instant, white-hot, wild,
    Wakened female of the species warring as for spouse and child.

    Unprovoked and awful charges—even so the she-bear fights,
    Speech that drips, corrodes, and poisons—even so the cobra bites,
    Scientific vivisection of one nerve till it is raw
    And the victim writhes in anguish—like the Jesuit with the squaw!

    So it comes that Man, the coward, when he gathers to confer
    With his fellow-braves in council, dare not leave a place for her
    Where, at war with Life and Conscience, he uplifts his erring hands
    To some God of Abstract Justice—which no woman understands.

    And Man knows it! Knows, moreover, that the Woman that God gave him
    Must command but may not govern—shall enthrall but not enslave him.
    And She knows, because She warns him, and Her instincts never fail,
    That the Female of Her Species is more deadly than the Male.

  21. Karen says:

    ah, yes since many of you stupid, filthy MGTOW are atheists, you will noy be scared off like thgis stupid follower of Jesus…

    I don’t know how many MGTOw have responded to my craigslist ad but it’s a good thing you can getchya rocks off without actually having to have contact with a vile woman!!

  22. Karen says:

    and you filthy MGTOW would use me as a “cum dumpster” but secretly wish this would happen:

    patriarchy in action bitches.

  23. Karen says:


    nothing worse than benevolent sexism. I get to hit bitches but you don’t. Be nice or I’ll cutt off that widdle pecker of yours next time you visit the glory hole.

  24. Pimentel says:

    Thanks for sharing with this advice, it may be useful for a person to use it for
    writing some essay, for instance. I particularly want to notice your
    ability to express data in an accessible way. As a popular-science blogger, then I need to be certain of every component of my writing to meet inquiring heads with quality advice and keep their interest
    until the close of the article. You made me read it until the end

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *