men compared to women

Artificial Womb Developments On the Horizon

60d57c5ac83d3d68d54ce25931d0b3bc
Comments (49)
  1. Dyson says:

    ‘I have recently heard that MGTOW has suggested making robotic women with synthetic wombs. Do you think this is fair to future children?’

    I wonder if she thinks abortion is fair to future children.

    1. tamerlame says:

      Women do not worry about what is fair to children when they become single mothers by choice.

      1. Dave says:

        A woman who chooses to take fertility drugs and pop out a sprog at 40 is a woman who will be 50 before that child reaches their teens. Is there anything so subtly tragic as a child being raised alone by their grandmother? But this is exactly the dynamic that “Oops! Almost forgot to have a kid!” women are creating,

        So much for caring about the children.

  2. John Galt says:

    The discussion of an artificial womb presupposes that individuals will have a right to reproduce with this technology. I’m curious why that belief is a default to the discussion.

    1. Ergeniz says:

      The more savvy of us are well aware that women will fight to the death to restrict the use of such technology, at least by males. The backlash against sex bots is a clear indicator of this. Women know reproduction is their ace in affirming their use to society and like any human, are loathe to give up such power.

      I suspect like the double standards revolving around sex and everything else (see the common consensus regarding a man who uses prostitutes or a fleshlight compared to a woman with a vibrator or is promiscuous) it will be argued the use of such technology is the sole domain of females and forbidden by males who would presumably use it for child abuse or some other ill defined strawman.

  3. Kyle says:

    Particularly with advent of deep learning algorithms in AI, we will get better and better at doing this at a more and more subtle level.

  4. Karen says:

    oh how the “mighty” have fallen.

    you have just admitted what every feminist with two braincells to rub together already knew. you are just a pronsick pervert who is angry that mommy wouldn’t let you have a puppy.

    1. Tor P B says:

      Always making it personal, as women always do. Throughout your writings here it’s “you” and “I” to the extent that it’s personal.
      “You probably have a small penis”
      “You live in your mother’s basement”
      “You should meet people more often”
      “You didn’t get a puppy”. I have to admit that was a new one, but in the same category.
      Let’s get to the facts. Women are more violent when it comes to domestic violence. That means that the people women are supposed to care about are the ones they treat the worst. And the numbers are pretty large , as well. I have posted other replies for you to read about this, but take a look at this one when you get here:
      http://www.sciencevsfeminism.com/the-myth-of-oppression/violence-by-women/domestic-violence-partner-violence-statistics-worldwide/
      Before you say something like “oh, I am supposed to trust an anti-feminist web page”, you have to block out your corpus callosum, (a part of your brain that works VERY differently in men and women) and understand that this web site is referring to research, not making it up. This is not about feeling, this is about logic. The research is from tens of countries (45 or more, depending on how you look at it) and the conclusion is pretty bad news for anyone who lives thinking that women are angels and men are demons: “Historical records show that women have always been the predominant perpetrators of violence in domestic and intimate environments.”
      I don’t know if you want to keep on using Belinda Carlisle and Kim Kardashian as a part of your argumentation, but these are not very good arguments, objectively speaking. I hope that you can see this.

      1. Karen says:

        The post you are quoting “oh how the mighty have fallen” was not sent by Me.

        They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery; and someone chose to expropriate My Screen Name to parody Me.

        It should be obvious; given the lowbrow grammatical & syntactical choices in the counterfeit post in question…but since males are far beneath Girls in terms of general language skills, your inability to distinguish that which was fabricated from that which is genuine is hardy surprising…

      2. Karen says:

        The four quotations you erroneously ascribe to Me were never made by Me; as I only make claims that can be verified; and that are germane to the debate at hand.

        I care not about your personal life; you constitute little more than a non entity…so your sleeping arrangements or household pets or phallic length are not factors when I pen a response.

      3. Karen says:

        TOR P B wrote:

        “Always making it personal, as women always do”
        >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

        But if you are terribly eager to be made aware of My Personal View; I will not misrepresent…

        I find males; with their grotesque sexual organs, consistently deficient personal hygiene, and brutishly Neanderthal temperaments revolting.

        The sooner they are collectively collared & leashed; the better.

        1. Tor P Bach says:

          So because I didn’t detect that it was not you, that is your response. And this is supposed to be you. You obviously have no reply to the fact that women are the disposable sex. Why did you even come to comment this article, then?
          English is my fourth language. Let’s see you try your fourth language.
          Again with the penis talk. You mention it again “I find males; with their grotesque sexual organs” and when it comes to temperament, did you read about domestic violence in the links I gave you. Does not seem like it. Doesn’t help with language skills when you are not using to do other than talk about neanderthals when men are the ones that built the computer you are sitting writing your words on.

          1. Karen says:

            Bumbling B says:

            English is my fourth language. Let’s see you try your fourth language.
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            My Native Tongue is Enochian; though I a seldom give television interviews in it; as neither FOX nor CNN has closed captioning in their software that includes that dialect…

  5. Max Hydrogen says:

    “the golden uterus is made of pyrite, fools gold and zinc.” Well said!

    Women can use a sperm clinic and choose from a selection which objectifies men and then have an abortion if they want but the very IDEA of men having the same amount of freedom is just apocalyptic…

    1. Karen says:

      Bach, Beethoven, & Brahms says:

      “English is my fourth language”
      >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

      So, in other words, am I to infer that means that you can count to three in four languages; or to four in three languages?

      *Ponders*

  6. Multishadow says:

    It’s funny how she can only see the purpose of synthetic human creation to harm women, and ignores the multitude of advantages which could be gained by altering genetics during gestation and selecting the most positive attributes or removing current biological limitations.

    1. Ergeniz says:

      They have no sense of foresight. They only think about themselves, in the present.

  7. Hermit says:

    ” Well, that takes care of that. On to more important matters.”

    Me after I’m done rubbing one out

  8. Yes, the tide is turning. Once a man takes the red pill it’s the beginning of the realization that he has a whole set of options he never considered or realized before. I’m luckier than the vast majority of married men I know in that the sex is the one area I don’t have much complaint about. Unfortunately, for my wife my sexual appetite hasn’t tapered off as much I expected it would compared to hers, and now she appears to be perimenopausal (read: even less horny).

    However, I will never return to the pussy begging of my youth, so I made it clear to all women I was sexually involved with, once I hit my 30s, that I will never beg for your sex like Oliver Twist nor will I ever impose my sexual needs upon you. I will simply fulfill my needs through other methods including or excluding sex with you, if you are unwilling to play ball (pun intended).

  9. Women need to work anyways and actually it makes economically less and less sense for them to be pregnant (hence the dropping birth rates). I am pretty sure this technology will be the final liberation for men from their gender role, to provide and protect adult women, who themselves actually need us less and less.

    1. Ergeniz says:

      As much as I wish for that to be true, I must dispute it on the fact that while women delude themselves into not needing men directly they cannot survive without men collectively. Hence their advocating of laws that allow men to cuckolded on a nationwide scale and the mass transfer of wealth from men to women via government. Even government is supported by males, as well as law enforcement. Women want to pick and choose individually which ‘attractive’ males to mate with, but know instinctively that most men’s labor and resources are needed. Thus they slowly have created western society as a means to optimize their desired mating strategy. Where the ‘boring’ men are denied sexual access but the females are still able to freely have access to their earnings.

      Technology which also ‘liberated’ women is overwhelmingly designed, created, maintained and utilized by men. Women merely benefited from it.

      Some part of my psyche almost desires women receive what they wish for, which is the demise of the male part of humankind. Knowing women would be left alone without anyone to leech off of, take from and use sexuality against is a high point. Without men, women would have absolutely no power and no future. Women would die a slow and agonizing death without men to manipulate for them.

      Women derive all their power by proxy of the male. Think of this scenario. A man and woman are in a life or death situation against some sort of wildlife or natural disaster. The woman’s ability to surive comes by coercing the male to brave the danger for her. Take the male out of the equation – the woman is almost guaranteed to be a fatality. Likewise, take the same scenario and have the male by himself. His chances of survival stay the same, or more likely even rise substantially because the woman is no longer endangering him by way of being a liability.

      I honestly believe that for the human race to evolve, women need to either be stripped of their sexual and reproductive advantage (but then they would essentially just be inferior versions of males) or eventually weeded out entirely. I am at the point where I believe women are the cause for most of, if not all of mankind’s ills. Aristotle, among others alluded to it, with such quotes as “Money would be worthless if not for the existence of women”.

      Even most religion hint at women’s base degenerate nature and ability to lead men astray.

      1. Karen says:

        The Little Engine Says:

        I am at the point where I believe women are the cause for most of, if not all of mankind’s ills. Aristotle, among others alluded to it, with such quotes as “Money would be worthless if not for the existence of women”.
        >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

        You mean Aristotle *Onassis*….Jackie Kennedy’s 2nd husband…not the inestimable Ancient Greek philosopher and scientist, right?

        {OMG imagine if he does not know the one from the other, lol}

      2. Karen says:

        An Ergent {SIC deliberately} message this way comes!

        “Even most religion hint at women’s base degenerate nature and ability to lead men astray.”
        >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

        Define “degenerate”.

        You might be able to; but all it will be is your subjective take on things. What is degenerate yesterday is suddenly normal today….because morality is transient and all in your mind. Morality is a social construct to keep the moralizers running the show and the non adherents subjugated.

      3. Karen says:

        Ergo (not Pergamos…so would not want him within 5000 fathoms of My Palace!!!) says:

        “I am at the point where I believe women are the cause for most of, if not all of mankind’s ills.”
        >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

        Are Women the cause of war? Hmm…no….almost all insurrections were commenced through masculine leadership since the start of the Age of Aries (circa 2000 BC).

        Are we the ones who polluted the soil, poisoned the water, decimated pant & animal life? Hmm….again, no, since males had a virtual monopoly on the development of less than stellar technology.

        Are We Women the ones who designed a series of economic philosophies rooted in unfettered greed….featuring interest rates that are nothing short of usury, exploitation of labor, Robber Barons, colonial exploitation and pillaging, child labor, and malevolence aimed at the weak? Nay yet again….

        Is most crime…be it violent or non violent….perpetrated by Women? I think we are 4 for 4 or batting a thousand…

        You would be well advised to exercise care when making broad summary indictments as you have; especially when they are grounded in ether.

        However, thank you for sharing. The Goddess will take your carefully considered opinion under advisement…

        *Laughs like *really* hard*

        1. Radium says:

          Everyone here knows what women can’t, I mean, don’t do. That’s easy. Perhaps you can elaborate on the great art, music, literature, science, technology, and industry that women create for society. And more specifically, what have you done for society besides endlessly trolling for male attention?

          1. Karen says:

            # Double 8’s says:
            “Everyone here knows what women can’t, I mean, don’t do. That’s easy. Perhaps you can elaborate on the great art, music, literature, science, technology, and industry that women create for society. And more specifically, what have you done for society besides endlessly trolling for male attention?”

            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            I come as a perilous flame, as a devious song, a trumpet in judgement halls, a banner before armies.

            I have come to immanentize the eschaton; i.e. make Belinda Carlisle’s 1987 signature song a reality.

          2. Karen says:

            Remember Boy; despite all the indoctrination of your youth that tells you I Am Myth; academia, the media, literary “scholarship”…deep within you, there is a voice that casts an element of doubt upon all you have been taught; a voice that realizes that My Existence is no more improbable than your own…

          3. Karen says:

            But think on this: My Way is not in the solemn ways, or in the reasoned ways, but in the wild free way of the eagle, and the devious way of the
            serpent, and the oblique way of the factor unknown and unnumbered.

        2. Radium says:

          You have come as a slave to your desire for male attention. You are literally leashed to your computer by your desire. Who knows how many websites you are closely monitoring. I know that as soon as I post something, I can count on an almost instant reply from you. This isn’t psychologically or physically healthy behavior.

          It’s summer time. Why don’t you get out and enjoy the beauty of nature? Why don’t you spend some time with family and friends? Why don’t you go for a walk at a local park or just sit outside and enjoy nature?

          You really need to take a break and get some exercise. You’re obsession is going to destroy you.

          1. Karen says:

            “You have come as a slave to your desire for male attention.”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            When did I make an overt request for attention? Be specific. If every post made signifies a “request for attention”, then all other posters are similarly guilty of this “misdeed”…including you.
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            “Who knows how many websites you are closely monitoring.”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            You seem to know; as you have claimed “insight” that escapes others. Why do you not share this information with the group?
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            “I know that as soon as I post something, I can count on an almost instant reply from you.”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            Only because I have planted those thoughts within your consciousness…
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            “This isn’t psychologically or physically healthy behavior.”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            Subjective & vague…and it is far from your place to critique Me. How absurd for a creature to evaluate His Mistress!
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            “It’s summer time. Why don’t you get out and enjoy the beauty of nature? Why don’t you spend some time with family and friends? Why don’t you go for a walk at a local park or just sit outside and enjoy nature?”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            Time does not mean the same thing to Me as it does to you…for to Me, a day is as a thousand years; and a thousand years but a single day.
            Moreover I am ubiquitous…here…there…and everywhere.

          2. Karen says:

            Radium says:
            “It’s summer time. Why don’t you get out and enjoy the beauty of nature? Why don’t you spend some time with family and friends? Why don’t you go for a walk at a local park or just sit outside and enjoy nature?

            You really need to take a break and get some exercise. You’re obsession is going to destroy you.”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            Moreover, this advice is not given from you to Me in friendship; or benevolence; or out of genuine concern for My Well Being….no, it is given in arrogance, in contempt, a condescension so profound that I am revolted by it.

            Why would I take counsel from one who detests Me?

          3. Radium says:

            “Moreover, this advice is not given from you to Me in friendship; or benevolence; or out of genuine concern for My Well Being….no, it is given in arrogance, in contempt, a condescension so profound that I am revolted by it.

            Why would I take counsel from one who detests Me?”

            Because I don’t detest you. I see you as a fellow sentient being who like all of us deserves compassion. What you’re doing really is self destructive. If I knew you in real life, I would invite you to join my friends and I for a walk in the park, kayaking trip, or dinner at the local microbrew. This I mean sincerely.

          4. Karen says:

            Of all the hundreds of messages I have posted to this board, this is the only kind-hearted reply I have ever received.

            Thank you.

      4. Karen says:

        You males; you condemn Women because We like attractive garments, cute trinkets, and lovely plush home furnishings…

        Let Me tell you something, boy…

        I would take Kim Kardashian over Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot any goddamn day of the week.

        Superficiality, in and of itself, never hurt anyone.

        You can call Paris Hilton “shallow”…but the girl never bombed Cambodia…

        1. Tor P B says:

          Yes, and Belinda Carlisle…girl. It’s great to have you here since you make such a great case of not answering the questions you receive with other than quotes and making yourself better than logic although you necessarily use “facts” (logic) to make the case that women do not do much harm (or any at all), which is dead wrong. Read my post above before you create more statements based on your belief that women are so lush and plush. You are wrong.

          1. Tor P B says:

            And no, we (I at least, do not) condemn you for liking garments and trinkets and spending men’s money on those things. But I do blame you for ignorance when you say that men are THE cause of pollution. Go live in the woods, then. It’s not an insult, it’s something to think about. Yes, PEOPLE pollute, and it sucks, and one of the things that pollute is hairdye, coloring for clothes, car manufacturing and the likes. And women are just as or even more violent.

            The reason we condemn women is what we have learned, thanks to men connecting on the Internet: you are liars and you have no agency. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1513729.stm You cheat and treat men like shit and we thought all along it was just “me”. As for violence goes women is the sex that awards bad behavior by going for the bad boy. Violent men in jail get more marriage proposals and letters than the nice guy who is a teacher. Men, however, hit down on violence through making laws. Female nature is out, and I hope you keep on posting your ridiculous thoughts here, countered by hard documentation from many sources (you see them above) to reveal more of female nature. You see, it’s magic: the more you girlys speak and write the more you reveal about yourself so you can’t win. You have nothing to counter this with. And I do recommend you read the book “The Privileged Sex” by Martin van Creveld to get some good history on female cowardice and treason, as well.

            “Women are also more violent in the more restricted intimate context (domestic violence) inter-sexually (see reviews, eg Moxon 2011), and studies show that intra-sexual (lesbian) relationships exhibit similar or considerably greater intimate-partner violence than either male same-sex or (the female perpetration within) inter-sexual samples (McCarry, Hester & Donovan 2007; Waldner-Haugrud, Vaden Gratch & Magruder 1997). Considering all forms of aggression – not merely the physical – women are no less aggressive than are men (eg, Campbell 1999)”.

            Good to know you.

          2. Karen says:

            The quotes are from an individual by the name of “Tor P B”…the first appearance by that screenname that I can recall…though he implores Me to gaze *supra* for some other thoughts he claims to have previously shared:
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            “But I do blame you for ignorance when you say that men are THE cause of pollution”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            I know few Women intimately involved in the waste disposal business; perhaps you can cite some of these “female captains of industry” that are responsible for despoiling so much of the natural splendor of Mother Earth?

            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            “The reason we condemn women is what we have learned, thanks to men connecting on the Internet: you are liars.”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            You needed the internet to tell you that We keep you in the dark on Certain Things? If that was the source of your epiphany; you have been walking around blind w/o a cane, boy…

            By the way, one fib uttered no more makes a person a liar than one truth told makes a person honest…
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            “and you have no agency.”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            Since agency is defined as the ability to get others to execute your will; We have a good deal more agency than males at the current hour; look how easily your breed is manipulated by Us.

            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            “You cheat and treat men like shit and we thought all along it was just “me”. ”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            People are treated the way they allow themselves to be treated…though Eleanor Roosevelt put it a bit more elegantly.

            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            “Violent men in jail get more marriage proposals and letters than the nice guy who is a teacher.”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            If you are the embodiment of the “nice guy”…Our Choices are hardly surprising. What Girl in Her Right Mind would want to waste Her Time with a spineless soul such as yourself? Just apply common sense; if you are so capable…

            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            “I hope you keep on posting your ridiculous thoughts here”

            >>>>>>>>>>>>>

            Not that I needed confirmation; but if someone as deluded as yourself deems my commentary “ridiculous”, it only verifies the precise opposite.

            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            “You see, it’s magic: the more you girlys speak and write the more you reveal about yourself so you can’t win.”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            Magic refers to prestidigitation & legerdemain; what was once called colloquially “sleight of hand”. There is nothing supernatural about it.

            I am about *Magick*; something you and your breed would know nothing of.

            We (and I specifically) reveal what We want to reveal; when We want.

            As for your pungent coda; We have already won; the rest is just consolidating the victory and figuring out how to get the most resources out of the vanquished (that would be your side).

            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            “Good to know you.”

            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            I cannot say the same…

          3. Karen says:

            The Impotent Torpedo says:

            “to get some good history on female cowardice”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            That may well be your most absurd statement in the sea of your delusion.

            Since We Women *TOOK* basically everything away from males and gave it to Ourselves in just 60 short years…with greater ease then when Schicklgruber strolled into Paris in mid 1940 and declared France his with nary a shot fired; well, I think you have the facts reversed…

          4. Karen says:

            Because you are male; the idea that there is a fine line between caution and cowardice; just as their is an equally fine line between bravery and foolhardiness is incomprehensible.

            So off with you; be as Tom Cruise and friends in that “4th of July” flic by Oliver Stone…his boyish “exuberance” to “fight & destroy” an ambiguous “enemy” that never overtly threatened him or his nation…though, in the long run, he learned the hard way.

          5. Karen says:

            The Princess wrote:

            People are treated the way they allow themselves to be treated…though Eleanor Roosevelt put it a bit more elegantly.
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            Always remember that there is a material difference between a slave and a prisoner.

            A slave is a being who has, in most ways, accepted his situation and makes no concerted and consistent effort to free himself. In most circumstances, he is resigned to his fate.

            However, a person in bondage who both recognizes and recoils from this condition; who actively seeks to thwart the thralldom thrust upon him is no slave; he is a prisoner.

          6. Karen says:

            The Princess wrote:

            However, a person in bondage who both recognizes and recoils from this condition; who actively seeks to thwart the thralldom thrust upon him is no slave; he is a prisoner.
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            Thereafter, the salient question for the constrained being becomes The Strength of His or Her Will.

            If The Will is besieged by weak, cowardly, pusillanimous impulses, the entity’s state of *mancipium* will persist unabated.

            However, if the being has the heart of a lion or lioness, well, as they say, the sky’s the limit….and all the kingdoms of the earth are there for their taking…

          7. Karen says:

            What makes a King out of a slave? Courage!

            What makes the flag on the mast to wave? Courage!

            What makes the elephant charge his tusk, in the misty mist or the dusky dusk? What makes the muskrat guard his musk? Courage!

            What makes the sphinx the seventh wonder?Courage!

            What makes the dawn come up like thunder Courage!
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            There is more truth in those few lines from The Wizard of Oz then one could ever imagine…

          8. Karen says:

            The Princess Wrote:

            there is a fine line between caution and cowardice; just as their is an equally fine line between bravery and foolhardiness
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            Remember, when I write of COURAGE being absolutely essential to successfully traversing one’s path in life, I DO NOT imply or equate courage with foolhardiness; or being a meat shield for another. Engaging in conflicts where the prospects for victory are essentially non existent; and the potential costs are your very life or all of your resources is not dissimilar to suicide; and that is profoundly unwise.

            Only a fool fights an unwinnable battle. If a conflict is demonstrably unwinnable, the prudent soul retreats, regroups, and re-evaluates. In other words, She Lives To Fight Another Day; when Her Chances of Victory are a good deal higher than the present hour. Those who ignore this advice do so at their peril; see Custer at Little Big Horn for a real life example.

            Likewise, one does not fight battles where the potential spoils are not substantial enough to elicit engagement. In other words, one should only fight for things that are very much worthwhile; and not something trivial or mundane…for this constitutes wasting one’s energies and resources….and violates the sacred cost / benefit conflict approach to life that I preach so vociferously.

            “No son of a bitch ever won a war by dying for his country. He won a war by making the son of a bitch on the other side die for his!”
            ___Patton

          9. Tor P Bach says:

            there are plenty of books and mgtow-videos that answer your utterances appropriately. I have answered you on the “female are peaceful” narrative you posted here, and there is evidence to the contrary of this, something, once men are made aware of this see clearly due to past experiences with women in their lives.
            Like I said: your replacement is around the corner, created by your neanderthal men, and that should be enough said. You can write all the poetic words you want and still the replacement will come. you can believe all that you want and still the replacement will come.
            I do not even know if 4 or 8 years of Hillary will assure you that she will keep wars coming, and no I do not support Trump either.
            Again you, just like women always do in discussions, point to men’s endocrine system and you have proven again that you are by all means a wo-myn; an unevolved brain pattern (read “Brain Sex”) and with a corpus callosum to block your ability to think logically. I thank you for that because it motivates me and others to keep on going our own way and work for your replacement. Are you getting any of this? I hardly believe it. You are about to be replace, honey bunch.

          10. Tor P Bach says:

            And after I make the comment that women always get personal with the penis stuff, and you say that I should have detected it wasn’t you, you actually do it yourself with your “impotent” remark, which you certainly do not know anything about. But that wasnæt you either, was it…

          11. Karen says:

            Johan says:

            “And after I make the comment that women always get personal with the penis stuff”
            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

            Fear not Sebastian; I promise that no woman will *ever* get personal with your penis…

  10. Paul says:

    Don’t forget, traditionalists and feminazis will do all their best to ban this!!! Despite scientific research the male need massive political advocasy!!!

  11. Karen says:

    The Composer With Occasional Forays into Fugues says:

    “Like I said: your replacement is around the corner”

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    Brother you can’t go to jail for what you’re thinking
    Or for that woo look in your eye
    Standing on the corner watching all the girls
    Watching all the girls, watching all the girls go by
    ____The Most Happy Fella / 1956

    My, with manspreading, “holloback”, wolf whistling, cat calling, and various other anti harassment ordinances; times have sure changed since Eisenhower….

  12. Karen says:

    The Bacchae (okay, not Euripides and certainly NOT Dionysus) says:

    “Again you, just like women always do in discussions, point to men’s endocrine system and you have proven again that you are by all means a wo-myn; an unevolved brain pattern (read “Brain Sex”) and with a corpus callosum to block your ability to think logically.”
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    I can do MRI’s over the computer Music Boy; allow me to check out *your* brain. Do not worry, I am sure I will find nothing inside…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *