Gynocentrism

Donald Trump, The Central Park Five, and Rape hysteria

he Central Park Five
Previous ArticleMale In-Group Bias?
Comments (18)
  1. it’s funny that the manuresphere loves Trump and claims to be “libertarian.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl77RcJPqGs

    Trumpiepoops would likely increase the surveillance state…

  2. “Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat.”

    guess which candidate said that?

    1. Karen says:

      Valerie Solanas?

      *Smirks*

  3. “I’m starting to become convinced that there are people in this world that absolutely love violence, love to watch violence, call for violence, and demand violence be visited upon others, but do not wish others to know that they are only doing so for their sick perverse desire to see others suffer. Thus they wait until a sufficiently dastardly and horrific crime comes along and project their sick deviant bloodlust on the (almost always men) who stand accused of heinous crimes, they care nothing about justice, they care nothing about what’s right, they just want blood they want the justice system to give them a fix. ”

    You gotta check out Advocatus Diaboli, the most cynical blogger I ever read…

    https://dissention.wordpress.com/2015/12/25/public-morality-and-the-fundamental-human-desire-to-harm-others-1/

  4. paul says:

    point is nobody is worth your vote, it’s all rigged, no matter who’s in it their player ….

    trump will help blow up the fucking world, he’s great mates with the bushes and the Clinton … both families are run by the true elites… you all may vote for either Burt or Ernest, point is they’re both on the same program, sesame street, it’s the true rulers, “the producers” you will never see

  5. Kong says:

    I forgot about this case, just awful and it’s even worse to think what might have happened to those boys if Trump got his way.

    I’m no fan of Trump but then I’m no fan of Clinton and Sanders either. Whoever wins or which ever party wins there will be nothing in it for men. The way I look at it is the Repubtards are just a little less friendly to women and feminism, and I know having Trump or Cruz in the White House would be a major blow to them so for this reason I hope it is Trump or Cruz who wins.

  6. Karen says:

    I have no problem with capital punishment for those found guilty of a capital crime…a nation manifests its respect for life when it implements the death penalty…by doing so, it states that the taking of an innocent life is such a heinous act that the perpetrator must pay with his own.

    I am cognizant of the fact that most people in prison (over 90%) are male; but, in fairness, are not most of those who commit crimes from that gender? I read that a black male is 60 times more likely to spend a portion of his life behind bars than a white female…a number that gives me pause…and may not be entirely reflective of reality…but, again, it is not just random chance, either. The former group does commit more violations of the criminal code than the latter…and no reasonable person can argue the contrary.

    1. Cake Griffin says:

      Adulterous wives, women who use the State to prevent fathers from being fathers, women who entrap men via (unwanted) pregnancy, women who have men pay for children that are not biologically theirs, scheme for child support/alimony, abuse men, misuse and abuse welfare programs, wage violence by proxy, abuse their children, spend child support money on alcohol and carousel riding, etc, those women should be imprisoned as well, but they aren’t. Hence the disparity.

      Hell, Casey Anthony walked after killing her child so that she can go back to the bar-hopping and dick-riding lifestyle that her (late) child was preventing her from engaging in.

      1. Karen says:

        >Adulterous wives

        Adultery is not a crime (unless we are suddenly operating under Mosaic Law).

        >women who use the State to prevent fathers from being fathers

        I do not know what you mean; but if you are talking about escaping from an abusive husband…no sane person would deem that a “criminal act”…

        >women who entrap men via (unwanted) pregnancy

        If a male does not want to be a father, I suggest he not engage in sex with women…it takes two to tango, boy.

        >women who have men pay for children that are not biologically theirs

        No woman has any male pay for a child that is not theirs…the State does…and hence, it is again not criminal.

        >scheme for child support/alimony

        Alimony and child support are again in the civil and criminal codes of most jurisdictions codes…so you are 0 for 5!…lol.

        1. Jasen says:

          He never said they were criminal, he said, or implied these things are immoral.

          you are wrong on every point you have made to debunk this guy…

          If a man engages in consensual se with a women who has told him she is on birth control, should he be forced to be the father of this child if the woman decides she wants to keep the child? The man has no say..

          You have no idea how advantaged you are as a female.

          1. Karen says:

            The misspelled Argonaut writes:

            “If a man engages in consensual sex with a women who has told him she is on birth control, should he be forced to be the father of this child if the woman decides she wants to keep the child? The man has no say..”

            He certainly does have a say…he can so “no” to having relations with her and avoid the problem altogether! It is like the cigarette smoker who develops cancer and then sues the tobacco company for his malady…the male…always shirking responsibility for his own misdeeds and problems that are of his own making.

            At the end of his list he said “those women should be imprisoned as well”, *implying* his worldview that such behavior is criminal. People are generally not imprisoned for actions that do not violate the criminal code. Reading is fundamental, boy.

            Morality is subjective, btw…what is moral today can quickly become immoral tomorrow….or vice versa. It also varies from venue to venue.

            I am not wrong on any points. I am only “wrong” in your rather limited & deluded little mind.

          2. Karen says:

            The misspelled Argonaut writes:

            “You have no idea how advantaged you are as a female.”

            Oh yes I do…

            *Evil grin*

          3. Ergeniz says:

            “You have no idea how advantaged you are as a female”.

            “Karen” isn’t a female.

            “He certainly does have a say…he can so “no” to having relations with her and avoid the problem altogether! It is like the cigarette smoker who develops cancer and then sues the tobacco company for his malady…the male…always shirking responsibility for his own misdeeds and problems that are of his own making”.

            Seeing as the law permits women to name men they have never even met as the fathers and extract money from them this is completely null and void as an argument. As the government “preventing fathers from being fathers” I would assume Cake Griffin is referring to said courts tyrannically enforcing child support/alimony by threat of imprisonment yet simultaneously ignoring said father’s visitation rights. Said double standards also target men but yet make no efforts to extract payments from women. This is criminal, seeing as sexism is supposedly illegal but we all know our femcentric society looks the other way in such cases.

            Imprisonment due to child support/alimony is also supposed to be illegal as it would technically fall under ‘debtor’s prison’ which The United States ostensibly eliminated under federal law in 1833 (btw I note through 1831, Massachusetts excepted ALL women from debt – yet another tidbit proving women were never an oppressed class).

            Some related links:

            http://www.purplemotes.net/2012/10/14/child-support-misrepresentation-reliance/

            http://www.purplemotes.net/2015/08/02/fathers-wallets-child-support/

            http://www.purplemotes.net/2012/06/23/gender-equality-development-ignoring-men/

  7. Karen says:

    Ergo says:

    “Karen” isn’t a female.

    That is a lie. I am a female biologically (I have a vagina, not a phallus) and legally (all legal documents that relate to my personhood indicate the same).

    When you stop spreading unsubstantiated lies, I will consider deconstructing your last bit of tomfoolery for you…until then, buzz off.

    1. Ergeniz says:

      Boob selfies plz

      1. Karen says:

        Ergo writes:

        “Boob selfies plz”

        There are times when I actually feel a twinge of sadness for males…my late father was an excellent person who taught and provided me with many things. But when questions like those are posed…revealing to me the sex starved and pervasively carnal nature of your gender…so rife with primitive crudeness, I end up reveling in the fact that I am a living witness to the gradual downfall of your kind.

  8. Karen says:

    On Ergo’s links:

    He has linked to a site where the articles include lengthy discourses on why males need to be paid for their “erection labor”… about “masculine burden of performance vis a vis farting”…and then something about “crapping crows”….

    If that is your repository of “wisdom”…you need your head examined.

  9. Tim says:

    How do you destroy a country? How do you destroy a counties hope to reach the middle class? How do you deplete good people’s deserved wealth to get through life without damning them to homelessness in old age? No fault divorce. Ok – kidding – not.

    How do you destroy the middle class? Read all you can about Glass Steagall and how both republicans and democrats, in concert with oligarchs, Faux News, MSNBC, CNN and wall street, plotted to destroy your life and the lives of those you might love/might have loved.

    If you’re upper class, how do you destroy the lower classes (the really good people) from having any hope of rising to the middle class (a now unbelievable goal)? You flood the country with low wage illegal immigrants, you replace the middle income earners with H-1B visa workers and you ignore the plight of anyone that breathes a word otherwise. What’s more, you seek to destroy anyone from the lower or middle classes that expresses the mildest form of rebellion. You silence the dissent. You shoot the messenger.

    Rubio, Jeb, Sanders and Hillary represent the establishment slave masters that will stop at nothing to fill their own pockets while emptying yours. Want to see where their policies lead? Look no further than Venezuela.

    Trump is our only hope. If trump betrays us, there’s nothing left to salvage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *