This post is an expanded transcript of a video post I made on my youtube channel titled Deconstructing Game, and PUA frauds. Several people have been requesting transcripts of older videos that I’ve made and so I figured I’d start with this one. In summation it is a critique of pickup artist tenets on the essential level. Thus this will not go into detail and debunk any specifics such as pua text game, conversational tricks that function as ice breakers or pua openers, “holding frame” or any of that silliness one may come across on the various pua forums populating the internet. We will talk instead about the motivations that drive the PUA instead of his specific behaviors. As inaccurate as it can be at times, the pua urban dictionary entry is the most succinct and accurate one I could find, at least according to what pua’s would have us believe:
Pick Up Artist. A master in the art picking up babes.
In reality PUA training and “game” are dependent on female sexual dominance. They have no mastery over women, they have mastery over how to properly serve them. This dominance, for the pua translates to all areas of male endeavor. It is a stifling backwards wasteful expenditure of male vitality. In any area where the practice of so called pua seduction techniques arises from natural conditions and social pressures, you will see the same associative symptoms of the pathology that causes game, which as I’ve said , is female sexual dominance over men.
Simply put. When male excellence is at a standstill and females have access to some external source of sustenance, or advantage over men you will see PUA and game arise. PUA, at it’s core is a prolonged game of cut-throat amongst men for access to females. When the state bankrolled female dominance over men in poor urban areas via welfare and other subsidies, the males in these areas, who were essentially strong armed into an equal economic status, were forced to find other ways to differentiate themselves to women.
And this is when male competition, the driving force of civilization, makes the transition from healthy male vs male competition, to ultra violent, economically destructive, poverty inducing and gynocentric male vs male competition. I remember in the early 90’s when you used to hear a lot about the epidemic of black on black crime in the areas where game first arose.
But I always new the term to be inaccurate. Not because the crime wasn’t happening, but because the root cause of this violence was never examined. What I mean to say is that one can take any community of men and women, regardless of race or any other distinctions, and after artificially inducing male economic poverty or at the very least, economic equality across the board, in this case via the crack epidemic and women’s only welfare programs and giving the women even the slightest amount of advantage economically (which is exactly what a welfare check is) you will see the men in particular turn against each other. The violence that ensues will not be black on black but male on male.
I challenge anybody to pull up the statistics, and see how much male on female violence comprised the total amount of violence during the epidemic of so called black on black crime. What happened exactly? Well, women were encouraged to remove fathers from the household in order to gain access to government welfare. The men were then blamed for the fatherlessness that ensued, and the rest that followed was drugs poverty and violent competition for females.
In other words this so called “black on black crime” wave was nothing more than a massive expenditure of male life and energy in hopes of re-establishing status and wealth for access to women after external, artificially induced conditions were implemented, resulting in an an economic reset button-push on the men.
This economic reset button-push, triggers a cascading set of events that can be likened to male vs male warfare. It is fought first through false bravado, hyper masculinity and posturing, and unfortunately, as this marathon of oneupmanship approaches a tipping point, the simple appearance of this skewed form of masculinity simply will not suffice, no… there has to be blood.
There has to be blood, because the women are always watching, you see… always. And the slightest challenge from one male to another can escalate extremely quickly at this point, since the farce must be kept up. This is far from a racial issue you see, it’s simply what will happen in some form or another when the price of pussy is inflated to a degree that it can be leveraged against men in the extreme. These men will then go about destroying each other, both figuratively and literally depending on the amount of collective desperation for sexual access that exists in the population of males in question.
This is the essence of game and PUA, males which resemble each other economically employing techniques to differentiate themselves for their own selfish sexual needs, it’s the study of the inner workings of unhealthy male vs male competition.
I will define this type of unhealthy male vs male competition as being any competition that doesn’t have a net positive result for both the winners and the losers. To test my theory ask yourself, if you where to take two men that implement game with equal frequency and talent, exactly equal in all ways other than the fact that one makes double the amount of money in comparison to the other, which one will the females choose every time?
I think you know the answer. Thus when the economic stakes are relatively equal, men must devise other methods of eliminating competition. They then begin to craft distinctions designed to sub humanize each other. They develop a rigid heirarchy of words and affix power to them based on what women want, and they begin to attack each other with this syntax, words such as alpha and beta etc.
Game and PUA techniques function as a groundwork for what is predatory male on male competition, nothing else. I read about an experiment that was conducted on male desirability in regards to the Lions of Africa. Lions are the only felines that grow manes and it was believed that a male lion’s mane was actually some sort of display of status and virility. To test this, four different stuffed lions where set up in different locations and hyena sounds where played to attract both male and female lions to the stuffed male lions.
It was found that females had an almost exclusive preference for the stuffed lions with black colored manes and that male lions would attack the lighter maned lions leaving the dark maned lions in peace. Studies on the health and virility of these darker maned lions also proved them to be superior specimens of their species in almost all regards… the true alpha males of their species.
These dark maned Lions are not the feline equivalent of the PUA and those that practice “art” of the pickup artist. If the light maned lions were to perhaps find a coal mine, and started rubbing their manes in it, to give the illusion of dark manes, then they would be the PUA of their species, if these lions then started attacking their still light maned counterparts, they would resemble the PUA even more.
This is because what a PUA is, according to their own terminology, is a bunch of “beta” men masquerading as alpha males. They will never be the dark maned lions, only an imitation of one that is clever enough to fool the females they wish to court (and whether or not they are actually succesfull in this is debatable really), and thats why they turn their hatred onto other so called beta men because they hate to be reminded of what they actually are.
They hate men that stopped caring about female determined categorizations of beta and alpha long ago. And make no mistake about it, these terms… “beta and alpha” are terms that are defined by the females that the PUA courts. They have no real control or say over it, game is and always has been female supplication and submission. If women decided tomorrow that “alpha males” randomly slap themselves in the face twenty or thirty times at various stages of the day, you would see these idiots in your local supermarket bitch-smacking themselves in short order. The PUA attempts to convince you that after obsessively studying what women actually want as opposed to what they say they want, that game isn’t about, and solely about giving females what they want regardless of what they say they want.
What then is healthy male competition exactly?. It is competition that requires real tangible and applicable talent. It is competition that furthers understanding in areas of real importance, competition that creates wealth, competition that furthers scientific understanding, It is Newton locked up in his study eschewing all human, and especially female contact, in order to bring calculus to the world, all while Leibniz was doing the same. It is competition in which male human athleticism is pushed to higher and higher limits.
Once again we are talking about healthy male competition with a net gain for all those participating in it. When Micheal Jordan, arguably one of the best athletes of all time graced the courts of the NBA, we saw a quality of male basketball players emerge the likes of which have never been reproduced since.
The best of the best, the Magic Johnson’s and David Robinson’s, they existed because the best of the best, created such a climate of excellence that all the others where forced to compete that much more, furthering their own excellence in the process. Scientific discovery is derived from healthy, male vs male competition. When Niels Bohr and Einstein were battling it out for the acceptance or rejection of quantum mechanics, the fervor with which these two heavyweights were taking shots at each other is the stuff of legend, but what differentiates this form of competition between that of the PUA, is that there exists an end result.
Something is produced, society is rewarded with something as a result of this conflict, our understanding of science was furthered. With “game” the only thing produced was a sex act, nothing of importance, and a possible pregnancy, for the vultures in the child support courts to live off of, as well as a chance for a self absorbed PUA to think to himself that he is a special snowflake mystery pickup artist lothario all thanks to his PUA training.
When a civilization is in decline, you will see the practice of game exponentially increase, since male ambition and talent is no longer funneled towards avenues of productivity, and is instead squandered on an animalistic mating ritual that is typical of a gynocentric herd breeding model.
What PUA does is it acknowledges female competition for “alpha males”, while never truly defining what it is.
What is an alpha male?
Let me tell you right off the bat, that no matter how the PUA or the proponents of game will tell you, an alpha male (at least the way PUA’s define it) is in the purest sense dictated and defined by the general consensus of women in regards to what makes a man sexually attractive, nothing else.
An alpha male according to the principles of the PUA, is any man that is sexually attractive to large amounts of women, that is the only requirement according to game literature. Trust me, they’ll try to tell you otherwise but in the purest sense it is their definition of the term. And so what women define or classify as an alpha male is what PUA’s attempt to emulate, because game is reactionary. It is a reflection of female power. Those that practice it will often mask this capitulation by insinuating that game is an attempt at understanding and thus, eventually controlling female psychology, and that statement may have some slight degree of truth to it, but what they hide is the end game.
The question that needs to be asked, is whether or not female psychology is worth scrutiny if the only goal of scrutinizing it is to occasionally get off, and whether or not there are suitable rewards to be garnered in attempting to control it, what are men as a collective getting out of it?
The juice isn’t worth the squeeze, men figured this out a long time ago, and set their sites on decoding and understanding the forces of nature and civilization as we know it was the payoff. Any culture country or nation in which the main area of male expertise is female courtship, will rapidly crumble in on itself. Implosion is the only possible fate awaiting those that put too much emphasis on the female psyche without eventually concluding that it must be ignored at some point for the purpose of improving the human condition in some real tangible way.
Game is a symptom of an addiction to the allure of women. this allure is biological, men are predisposed to like women, thus there can either be a frenetic mad dash to bask in the allure of women, or an attempt from men to escape their biology, and in this regard females are way ahead of us. Any legitimate discussion from men in terms of exploring ways of surmounting and escaping their biological mandate and compulsion is deemed by the PUA and feminists alike as something to be shamed and ridiculed. It is deemed “beta behavior” if i were using PUA syntax, MGTOW is the first attempt at such a thing, but somewhere someday, some beta scientists will break the female monopoly on breeding, thats a matter of course, not if but when. This will be the point in which equality between the genders will be achieved or something close to it, this is the point in which men will surpass their last and final female dependancy, when the technology exists that will allow any human being, man or woman to take ownership of their own genetic legacy.
We see over and over how fervently females fight being controlled by their biology through sperm banks, through restricting the possibility of a father to conduct a paternity test, through abortion for their conveniance, women fight to eliminate the negative consequences of their biological compulsions, and men fight to convince women to let them indulge in theirs as much as possible
Pua = manginas that occasionally(?) get laid. That’s it. Nothing more. Finally I will leave you with some previous posts that show the gynocentrism of some of these people. Read and enjoy gentlemen.