Most females can’t rate intelligence because they are not familiar with intelligence. They are familiar with the sly. Sly and intelligence are not the same though. Females are only occasionally acquainted with intelligence when they are using it for practical ends. In the same way that some will state womanizers who use women are misogynists, most women are misandric of real masculinity by way of how they use intelligent males with no real respect. Females’ lack of abstract aptitude unfortunately designates misconceptions and poor engagement.
Just like how the politically inclined deludes itself by reducing much to left-vs.-right in order to try to make sense out of what is too mysterious to them, simplistic and meager categories predicated by feminine collectivism and subjective extrapolation of masculinity & femininity simply defined as active-or-passive, shy-or-confident, prude-or-obtaining, dom.-or-sub., gentle-or-intense, etc., is, to be thorough again, highly misleading and not even accurate. The only accurate binary conclusion in this context is actually logic-or-energy. Energy as masculine and logic as feminine. I’m being sarcastic with the previous sentence.
The dichotomy of beta-or-alpha is farcical considering that it was “beta” males who were the ones who established most of what is important & functional. “Betas” gave “alphas” language, condoms, etc.. We fucking created you. This means that “beta” males are truly alpha because they are the ultimate mastering force, but the abuse by females of “beta” males in conjunction to their immature sexuality & collectivism – attraction to males that mimic them – creates wrong answers. “Beta” males truly dominate society & harness nature. They are unemotionally detached. They are the true, ultimate meaning of masculinity. The only thing they tend to not dominate is the arena of sex, and so females don’t regard them highly.
As I explained how females’ lack of abstract aptitude indoctrinates faulty, simplistic categories, often binary, females also don’t know how sex works, as indicated in their rampant fascination with b.d.s.m. and other digressions they favor to try to make themselves believe they are central – expressing the extra journeys and trinkets they think “should” be given to them, which is due to their, historically, willingness to be mesmerized by males who have a characteristic that is strongly influenced by femininity and tendency to mimic it. The only reason many males share similar sexual interests is because they are addicted to pleasure and have not had the opportunity to be conclusive – they have not fought off the mental sickness that accompanies such sexuality. Females’ natural tendency to make themselves central ingrains their preferences & traits. Females are anti-science/anti-logic/anti-
To use a commonly misunderstood reoccurrence that will be more recognizable to explicate how such inaccurate binary categories manifest by derivation from anti-science/lack of abstract reasoning: The archetypal “Nerdy” male wants it, especially due to repression, but they sense or speculate something is wrong, so they usually gain some kind of anxiety/neurotic disorder due to the inhibition & tension due to dualistic “tearing”, then female observers superficially just label “awkward”, etc..
One of the most common retorts is: “Stop being afraid of your penis. Females are desirous of surrendering to you.” “Do you even realize how easy it is to attain a female sexual partner?”, etc., etc.. Sure, it’s easy to attain such, but this is what they disregard: It’s MAINTAINING it that is burdensome. Like caring after a child & not getting paid for it, other than with sex & affection, which will eventually wane.
Sure, males have made some blunders throughout history, but that’s just a natural extra product of leading. We would have made far less mistakes if females didn’t have as much influence in terms of selection.