Simplistic theories of evolution explain males as actively fueled by testosterone, candidacy, aggressive tournaments, & Rivalry. Healthy rivalry in the realm of scientific discovery is a reality as well, which is a salient facet of HEALTHY male rivalry many theorists completely disregard.
What aspects of females are thought to have better a unified analysis of human evolutionary sexuality? The most obvious incomplete answers are that of them being puny & at rest. In the easy to read book ‘A Mind of Her Own: The Evolutionary Psychology of Women’ by Anne Campbell, the author brings better insight that females have their own indirect aggression, concours, recreancy, & hostility, & rarely any HEALTHY rivalry of scientific or philosophical civilized strife. A re-evaluation of the female mind as “kindness embodied” is exigent.
In contrast to females’ feuds & shaming revolving around celebrity dump foundries because they are the hosts & subtle announcers of the game, like gassy demons of hell stoking the fires and encouraging and playing with the badness, males’ competition detained in the game revolves around vulnerability by the game that sets the female owned advantages of hypergamy.
The definition of hypergamy needs to be made exact.
It is not the secondary meaning of what traditional conservatives and the like religiously abide by as a sober thing that females are seeking “healthy” genetics of successful males, it is greed and disloyalty. The trad-con interpretation, and many others’ unconscious recommendation, is that life is a series of pain you must master. This is seemingly empowering, but upon further realization, the game is duplicitous. The honer and respect that trad-con types desire, when accentuating of the glorious olden days when men were men, eating large quantities of beef, and women were women, making beef, and men were brave – a combination of stupid and dangerous – by signing themselves for war, not even realizing that a large percentage of females had affairs during soldiers’ duty, and said wives would sleep with the apposition if opportunity gave, would be ruined by the complete nihilism that is inborn of the female, inimical to the supposed “justice” that such trad-con types lazily pretend to be for.
Most males have the tension on some level that they are vulnerable amidst the natural nihilism of females, including males who get sex the most, hence their reason to try to get as much as possible by acting. Devaluing of other males who aren’t playing the game is rooted in this subconscious vulnerability. They feel implicitly reviled. Males who aren’t even interested in playing the game are rated as low as a defense mechanism. Often times these males who aren’t playing the game unintentionally cause attraction, often in females who are already romantically involved, because their lack of interest is perceived as power to those females. Rather than scolding the female because the male participant in the game intuits he is in vulnerability to challenge the subtle judge of the game, the male participant afflicts anyone who gives an inkling, or a potential clue of the stupidity of the game, of an intruder to the game, & especially if it is a physical intruder.
This is no lie at all (Not that any of my statements are): A male’s penis can actually retract back towards his body when he is in a state of nervousness. (I will not dig through thousands of piles of pages to source it.) It can occur when he is initiated with sex from a female whos true motives, such as megalomaniacal validation, which will often just be shortly validated by another moron, & another, & another, etc., are questionable to his subconscious mind, in addition to possible factors of being offered unappealing body parts. Intelligent males know on some level that they are playing with the volatile when offered sexuality from females. This reality causes troubling disorders in a vast majority of intelligent males because they are being manipulated by frenzied directions. The insult to deflect those intelligent as “pussies” stems from an emasculated culture that values style over intelligence because people who are less intelligent usually try to disguise this deficiency in logic by being stylish. It is predicated on females’ insistence to rate levels of fear, disregarding rational fear.
Anecdote: One day at a Grocery line a very stupid animal flirted with me specifically based on the assumption that I looked angry because I was staring at what seemed to her to be my girlfriend interacting with another male; “Is that your girlfriend. Hehe”. My supposed embroilment & unavailability is what actually made her attracted to me, which reveals their tacit fascination with disloyalty. I spitefully told this filthy animal that I was actually angry because she was speaking to me as if I was on her level. When I stated this, she only became more aroused by me because my anger showed a symbol of power to her. Again: almost every symbol of power being warped as a definition of “success” (or sex-sex, as I like to call the lurking lasciviousness of females.) by feminine sexuality. She was not attracted to the logic within my anger, just the aesthetics.
Rather than wasting energy even trying to punish females because that will only be translated to them as “sexy”, not matters of right-and-wrong, If all of us males just stop playing the game, we can take away the power of the female umpires, replacing the insidious judgement with orderly and veracious determination.
Females are nihilists. There are some males who vie with such, but only to gain admittance. Kind of like the saying: ” You want to understand the animal, you have to get inside the animal”, or something like that. Same idea.
Like water, they wrap themselves around any “solid rock.” That can range from the good to the bad, & often transitory – bullies, teachers, drug dealers, comedians, a male already sexually involved, married men, loud delusional people on a public bus, etc..
Why would you want to handle such a squander? The answer is because of the addiction to the pacification contra excogitation that sexuality causes. It’s really not of concern for those who don’t aspire or have ever attended to something else of dignity, so their willingness to frequently hide susceptibility, act, chronically waste energy on what is nearly equivalent to a dog, having delusions of a worthy enterprise, welcoming bathos & stupidity, is not going to jeopardize the lack of purpose.