I found an article on the topic of infant circumcision, fibroblasts and the cosmetics industry titled The Bizarrely Profitable Business Of Baby Foreskins and I wanted to share with you the, frankly vile stuff that the cosmetics industry is using the foreskins of mutilated baby boys for, after they are acquired by hospitals and doctors charged with the care of newborn baby boys of course. The article starts out as follows:
There exists a Holy Grail in the cosmetic industry to create a cream that sheds years off your skin. Scientists have discovered such a ingredient, fibroblast cells. Fibroblasts cause the skin to regrow the elasticity and elegance of youth for whoever uses a fibroblast-based cream. What is the best source for these wonder cells? Baby foreskins.
In the movie Fight Club, when Tyler Durden talks about his infamous soap made from human fat, he wasn’t making stuff up. While Tyler Durden is himself a fictional character, human fat soap is real. But making human blubber into soap isn’t where the cosmetic companies stop. No, there is a secret precursor to a lotion that guarantees youthful-looking skin. This Holy Grail for skin creams is one that recreates the smooth, wrinkle-free skin that so many lust after. And 50 percent of the population has what the cosmetic companies need. It’s not fat, but it’s another body part that some of us just want to get rid of right away: the foreskin. That’s right, the tip of the penis that is cut off in religious ceremonies throughout the world is really a fountain of youth, and actually one of the best sources of fibroblasts.
Fibroblasts are what cosmetic companies have been looking for all these years. They are the key to growing new skin and are therefore widely used for skin grafts, pasting skin transplants over sores, and other skin conditions, which makes them great for cosmetic applications. One baby foreskin can be stretched to grow almost $100,000 worth of fibroblasts.
So again on the topic of infant circumcision, fibroblasts and the cosmetics industry, just… where exactly do these people get off harvesting human beings for their own profit?. We’ve seen the controversy surrounding planned parenthood and the alleged sale of fetal tissue for profit… a felony, and we’ve seen people get up in arms over that, but when it comes to live baby boys, outside of the womb, infant boys that feel very real infant pain, when these infant boys are strapped down to get circumcised and a piece of their body they cannot grow back is sold to the highest bidder for profit, well, thats just good business. Baby forskin is apparently not worthy of our outrage, but worthy of an inclusion as a commodity into the free market.
I discourage men from getting circumcised, even voluntarily, since I believe the foreskin is not something to be removed but instead an integral part of a healthy penis. But why cant these people, these cosmetics companies simply take the foreskin of men who voluntarily get circumcised? Perhaps there are more of these fibroblasts packed into the foreskin of baby boys? Or perhaps limiting their access to foreskins they can use to only men that have been voluntarily circumcised would make the costs too exorbitant? who knows, but either way the foreskins of infant boys should remain intact and they certainly should not be removed for something as trivial as women who cannot get over their wrinkled appearance in the mirror. The article continues:
Big names are coming out to get behind these products, including the biggest name of all, Oprah. Oprah famously endorsed one company’s lotion on her show and website as a miracle cream. The company, called SkinMedica, saw soaring profit and this prompted anti-circumcision groups to follow her around and protest her use and promotion of foreskin cream. Granted, SkinMedica’s lotion uses the cells from one original baby foreskin harvested years ago, but just think about it: With Oprah’s plug, millions of women around the world are smearing cream from the foreskin of one guy all over their faces.
-A Video of the gynocentric Steve Harvey where the foreskin cream is being promoted-
SkinMedica isn’t the only company in the game. A company called Vavelta is selling fibroblast injections that help create “skin-firming protein called collagen, which becomes increasingly scarce with age.” Vavelta hopes to supersede the billion-dollar Botox industry by using a needle-based injection system of their own that involves getting 20 million fibroblast foreskin cells under the user’s skin. Even if the source of fibroblasts is a little odd, their competition is injecting toxin that can cause life-threatening botulism and makes its users look perpetually surprised, so take your pick.
Oh I see, we have to take our pick of women injecting their post-wall aging faces with either botox or fibroblasts harvested from the mutilated foreskins of circumcised infant boys…we cant just, I don’t know, tell these aging narcissists to go gracefully into old age? nah that would be too much for the poor dears, so off we go to the penises of newborn baby boys to cut off a piece of their genitals to make women feel better about themselves.
In previous posts I’ve shown you that many women are perfectly happy with the mutilation of baby boys to satisfy their own aesthetic preferences surrounding the male member, but now it has been taken a step further and the male penis, at least part of it that has been excised shortly after birth is being used to satiate the aesthetic vanities of women as well. Some of these same women will have the nerve then to say that western civilization is exploitative of the female body, that it holds up the female form as a sex object and ignores the person attached to it, all while ignoring the fact that theres seemingly no end to how far females feel entitled to the mutilation of the male penis for their benefit.
This madness has to stop, I am dedicating at least one article a month to try to raise awareness about circumcision, below are the articles I’ve already written on the subject, feel free to peruse them at your leisure.