This link is for a 6 year old story in Psychology Today about female pedophiles. The article showcases Debbie Lafave as an example. I saw some parts of the story that I found to be bothersome in that the attitudes about female pedophiles discussed here haven’t really changed all that much. The article in which Jennifer Fichter got 22 years for her crimes have yet demonstrated if finally imprisoning these women for terms commensurate for their crimes is a trend, or an isolated case.
First. The article was written by Gad Saad PhD. This gentleman has a PhD from Cornell University. His Wikipedia page doesn’t say what discipline his PhD is in, but he holds B.S. in mathematics and computer science, and has an M.B.A. So I will go out on a limb here and say that he is not an authority on Psychiatry, Psychology (abnormal), or criminal profiling.
“The idea is that Debbie Lafave is such a dangerous predator that she was forbidden to have any contact with “children” such as her 17-year old female coworker.”
The tone of this idea, is that this restriction is ridiculous. The idea of such restrictions is that Debbie Lafave has demonstrated a willingness to manipulate minors. She is a prime example of the female pedophile, bottom line. Younger people are more impressionable. As such, she should not have access to a vulnerable population. Minors, the elderly, and the mentally and physically handicapped are considered vulnerable populations.
“As a matter of fact, I cannot think of a single instance where a woman was arrested for being a serial predatory pedophile.”
Keep Googling bitch.
“However, to label her, a dangerous “sexual predator” is insulting, as it minimizes and trivializes the millions of children who are victimized by dangerous sexual predators, most if not all of whom are recidivist and incorrigible male pedophiles.”
Okay, Now I know this guy is a card carrying feminist mangina. The discussion of the diversion of resources tell me that we need to be sure that we are keeping the money flowing towards the men when it comes to imprisonment. Because of this, we need to keep the money flowing towards women when it comes to being a victim(hood). If money goes towards women being imprisoned for rape then money would flow towards males because they are victims. To acknowledge that males can be the victims of rape, domestic violence, and discrimination would drive a stake through the heart of the idea that women are a disenfranchised segment of society.
“Most teenage boys spend much of their waking hours dreaming of meeting “sexual predators” such as Debbie Lafave. Hence, it is somewhat silly to propose that the teenage boy in question has suffered irreversible damage at the “horrifying abuse” that he faced (which if memory serves me right he seemed very keen to partake in).”
And this fucker also wrote.
“One final thought: my father married my mother when he was 19 and she was about to turn 16. In many American states, this could have landed my father with the lifelong appellation of “dangerous sexual offender.” Nice! It is much superior to have legal codes rooted in a proper understanding of our biological-based human nature rather than creating statutes that are founded on false concerns for political correctness.”
If we look at five year old article linked below, and we get past our disgust over the title, we will see that one of the victims was a four year old little boy. You fuck. The application of laws against men for having sex with minor females is so rigidly enforced because it is the common understanding as to how damaging the experience is to the young mind. How is it that this experience is mitigated by being male? There have been plenty of instances where male teacher had consensual a relationship(s) with female, minor students and they did tall time in prison. Equal protection under the law.
Either we make it okay for adult men and women to have sexual relationships with minors or we don’t. Either we throw clitorises and breasts in the disposal along with a man’s penis so that Sharon Osbourne can have a laugh, or we all say that is morally repugnant and that no one should be the victim of such treatment.
That Jennifer Fichter is looking at the possibility of not breathing free air until she is in her 50s is an indicator that the American populous is getting tired of hearing about our underage sons being molested no matter how hot the woman is or not. We can only hope that this is a continuing trend. The fact that she may have a SMV above 6 isn’t worth consideration. This article has demonstrated that the opinions of “What teenaged boy doesn’t want to boink a hot teacher”, and “She isn’t that big of a danger to society” or even “He wanted it as much as I did” is a mainstream idea in media and culture. If we were to reverse the pronouns in the previously mentioned opinions, then men and woman would be calling for the head of Gad Saad Ph. D.