men compared to women

Are Women Evil?

women evil
Previous ArticleRandom stuff 1
Comments (62)
  1. Bravedelta says:

    Well that was really long, also why so much dislikes?

    1. Max Hydrogen says:

      @Bravedelta

      Maybe because it seems a bit echo-chambery.

      1. Bravedelta says:

        LeL

      2. Michael says:

        Its because men don’t want to admit that they themselves are not that great.

        The human race is overrated.

  2. Mask says:

    I made it to the end and don’t find myself disagreeing.

  3. Billy Clubs says:

    Wow man this is a masterpiece. So much so that I have to make this post.

    1. Tnk says:

      I agree, this is brilliant. And i wonder, can man and woman ever be equal due to their biology, perhaps we could, i just look at the movie Avatar, men and women in that movie are equal due to their suroundings and the way of life, is this possible with homo sapiens, i dont know, perhaps it is, but not on this planet with the current standard way of life. Perhaps a question that can only be aswered by the ones who created us the way we are.

  4. Pellaeon says:

    “Sure, but are you a submissive and obedient man who loves a woman not for her looks but for her inner specialness? ”

    Yes, actually this does describe a large number of blue pill men. Particularly the married ones. A lot of men go the “nice guy” route and only start buying into the “men should be masculine, women should be feminine” mentality until after they realize that being submissive and obedient negatively impacts their ability to get laid.

    Haven’t finished the rest of the article yet, but I will later

    1. George says:

      Being submissive and obedient may negatively impact a man’s chance to get laid (as it would his chances of having healthy peer friendships and do well at work – no one likes a sycophant) but it’s unclear why he should then swing to the opposite extreme and expect women to be submissive and obedient.

      The realization that sycophancy doesn’t make women more attracted to you – nothing does – can be the catalyst for developing a healthy model of relationships, one based on respect for each partu.

      The irony is the the kiss up approach is often replaced with a more refined form of kiss up. It is not a coincidence that many PUAS used to be kiss ups – their psychology hasn’t changed, just their tactics. They are just trying to be better kiss ups.

      The relationship model of a kiss up is between servile and dominant. He cannot conceive of two mutually self respecting adults engaging in an equal give and take. He starts out by adopting the servile position, and finding that doesn’t “work”, he tries to adopt the “dominant” role, since that is the only other role ge can conceive of.

      Of course that doesn’t work either, because healthy relationships are based on mutual give and take. Yet the kiss up is stuck – the only two roles he can conceive of have failed him, yet he cannot admit this so he proceeds to spin his wheels and tell himself he needs “more practice” in the dominant role.

      1. Pellaeon says:

        Hi George,

        Thank you for replying to my comment.

        The realization that sycophancy doesn’t make women more attracted to you – nothing does

        Could you clarify what you mean by “nothing can make women more attracted to you?”

        Are you saying that you don’t believe that a man can increase a women’s attraction to you beyond a base established by your looks and status?

        Are you saying that you don’t believe a man’s behavior has any affect whatsoever on a woman’s level of attraction to him?

        Or is there a different nuance to what you are saying that I am not perceiving?

        Also, could you provide some examples from your own experience to explain why you think this way? My own interactions with women lead me to believe that your behavior can actually drastically effect your ability to arouse a woman. I try to be open minded though, and I need someone to provide strong evidence that counters my current beliefs before I will change them.

        1. George says:

          I’d be happy to explain my position.

          Yes, I think behavior has ZERO impact on attraction qua attraction. You can’t increase sexual attraction – at all – through behavior. Its entirely looks and status.

          Behavior can have some affect on your likelihood of hooking up, though. Extremely off putting behavior – extreme arrogance or hostility – can drive away an attracted woman, as can extreme social awkwardness (although the bar is set lower than most men are worried it is).

          As long as you’re not particularly off putting your behavior has almost no impact.

          And to the extent that behavior does matter, it is in the direction of being sociable, friendly, and without ego – the opposite of PUA advice.

          Its almost impossible to provide evidence over the internet, but I am basing this on over a decade of heavy going out – I’m a big partyer, although I’ve slowed down lately – and believing, once, like you did, that behavior makes a difference.

          1. braininavat says:

            It is good to see someone say this explicitly: behavior has little or no effect on the fundamentals of attraction. It is hard to accept, but I think it is largely true. Either you have it, or you don’t have it. And if you don’t have it, you can only fake it, and faking it is not the same as having it.

          2. Pellaeon says:

            Thanks for continuing the discussion with me George. I know it can be annoying to sit down and attempt to explicitly spell out one’s position via a comment, so I appreciate you putting the effort in.

            Could you further clarify what you mean by “attraction qua attraction,” and how that differs from “the likelihood of you hooking up?”

            Also, could you clarify your beliefs on how a woman measures your “status?’

            Its almost impossible to provide evidence over the internet,

            I disagree – it’s simply a matter of formulating a falsifiable hypothesis on how a given interaction would play out based on one’s beliefs, and then providing details from various interactions that play out in a manner that supports that hypothesis, or in a manner that diverges from the prediction.

            It DOES, however, require trust that the other person is being honest, and paid enough attention to remember the details later. From the tone of your posts, and the effort you’ve put in to explain yourself, I believe I can trust that any experiences you share are, at the least, a best faith attempt to share the truth. I hope you can feel the same way about me.

            I’ll provide an example of what I mean in my next reply – I don’t want to pollute the discussion with my own assumptions on what you mean by “attractIon” and “status vs behavior” before you’ve had a chance to further clarify.

          3. George says:

            Sure, Palleon, I’d be happy to oblige.

            Sexual desire is sexual desire, sometimes known as lust. However, lets say a woman is abusive and demeaning towards me – I may choose not to satisfy my sexual desire with her, no matter how attractive I find her.

            This is does not seem like a confusing concept to me – can you perhaps explain what seems puzzling to you about it, or what needs explaining about it?

            Women assess your status by a close scrutiny of your lifestyle, wealth, and social circle, over an extended period of time (several dates – its partly what dating is for).

            Behavior is not a significant factor in assessing status – many extremely high status men are quiet and do not draw attention to themselves in public, and it is common for low and medium status men to act splashy in public, out of a desire to convince others they possess something they realize will not be readily perceived or granted them. Status signalling is commonly a reflection of status-anxiety, and very far from from an accurate signalling of the real thing.

            I am less sanguine than you about how feasible it is to test a hypothesis in this field – humans love to see causation where none exist. Its a huge problem even in science, especially the science of nutrition (http://www.dcscience.net/2009/05/03/diet-and-health-what-can-you-believe-or-does-bacon-kill-you/)

            Reliable evidence would take years of constant controlled testing and controlling for variables, false causality, and other confounding factors.

            But if we don’t hold ourselves to an impossibly high scientific standard, I do believe we can make some common sense observations that would produce a reasonably acceptable picture, and since I have over a decade of extensive experience I’d be happy to take that journey with you.

          4. Pellaeon says:

            Thanks again for continuing the dialogue. I’ve got to pack for a fifteen hour train ride on Thursday, and I want to be able to devote enough time for a proper response, so I probably won’t be able to truly follow up until Thursday night.

            I just wanted to give you a heads up so you didn’t think I was going to leave you hanging.

          5. George says:

            No worries, take your time, my friend. Enjoy the train ride (as much as a 15 hour train ride can be enjoyed. I’ve taken many such rides, especially in India)

          6. Pellaeon says:

            Sorry for the extreme delay in responding, even after the deadline I’d set for myself. I didn’t end up getting any sleep the night before my train ride…then I got caught up in my vacation…and then I’ve just been procrastinating on being productive since I got back. I have this strange reaction to writing posts – when I first read a comment, I have an extremely strong urge to write a response, but if I don’t write one while that urge is there, then it turns to apathy and I tend to move on to the next one. In this case though, you have been very responsive to the dialogue, and I do want to continue it, so I had to overcome my usual apathy, which took some energy when I’m in the midst of procrastination mode.
            Anyway, to finally address your points:

            This is does not seem like a confusing concept to me – can you perhaps explain what seems puzzling to you about it, or what needs explaining about it?

            When you said you did believe that behavior can affect your chances of “hooking up,” I wanted to make sure I understand the difference in your mind. For some people, they would strictly define attraction based solely on whether or not a woman sleeps with you. Beyond that though, I find in any debate/philosophical discussion that it is crucial to come to a mutual understanding of terms. It’s very possible that we actually share the same views, but the semantics we use to express them are different enough that it appears we disagree. Furthermore, even if there is a fundamental agreement, defining terms allows me to comprehend exactly what your arguments entails so I don’t waste time fighting straw men born purely of my ignorance on your language style.

            For myself, I subscribe to the “alpha fucks/beta bucks” view of attraction that Rollo Tomassi operates from when he writes his blog posts. The form of “attraction” that RBK outlines in this article – evaluating a man based on his utility to her – falls under that concept of “Beta Bucks” attraction. As Rollo would say, a woman speaking of “attraction”, in this context, uses it in the same way that she might say a counter is “attractive.” This kind of attraction inspires women to sleep with men on a sort of maintenance basis – in many ways it’s like a chore designed to keep the attention from a man alive and well, but otherwise inspires very little lust within her. On the other hand, there is the “alpha fucks” form of attraction, which Rollo would term “arousal” and other manospherians would term “tingles,” where a woman experiences that same primal level lust that men feel for a well-shaped woman. It is an irrational drive that pushes for an immediate, or near immediate, outlet for that sexual tension.

            I don’t believe that these are binary states – I believe that they exist, separately, on a scale. I believe it’s possible for a woman to feel similarly high or low levels of both BB attraction and AF arousal, and I also believe it’s possible for a woman to feel a high level of one form but a low level of the other. I also believe that, for a woman to sleep with a man, no strings attached, she needs to reach a certain minimum level of AF arousal AND experience a high enough level of it that her body instinctively perceives that the “price” to be paid (which is dependent on the circumstances) is lower than the benefit of obtaining the man’s genes through sex. I specifically say body and not mind because I don’t believe that a woman’s conscious mind plays any part in that evaluation – consciousness belongs to BB attraction and unconsciousness belongs to AF arousal.

            I also believe that it is possible to “measure” AF arousal, albeit extremely inaccurately, through what Pickup Artists would term “Indicators of interest.” These would be subtle body language cues given off by the woman, often unconsciously. Things such as playing with her hair, especially if she reveals the nape of her neck to you in the process, crossing and uncrossing her legs in your direction, touching you. Also, even subtler body language cues such as a stiff/tense posture while standing next to you and tilting her head slightly so as to place you JUST within her peripheral vision.

            Reliable evidence would take years of constant controlled testing and controlling for variables, false causality, and other confounding factors.

            But if we don’t hold ourselves to an impossibly high scientific standard, I do believe we can make some common sense observations that would produce a reasonably acceptable picture

            I agree , and my point was that I wanted to hear some specific details about interactions you’ve had. For example, there was an incident back in college that solidified my belief in my ability to judge whether or not a woman is attracted to me. I was listening to the professor lecturing, and I got the distinct feeling that one of my classmates was checking me out (she was in my peripheral vision, and I was not consciously paying attention to her at first). When I looked over at her though, I saw absolutely no direct signs that she had been looking at me – I didn’t catch her quickly turning away and she did not acknowledge that I was now directly looking at her – she appeared to be paying complete attention to the professor.
            When I turned back the feeling went away…for about three to five seconds, at which point that feeling returned. Again, I looked over at her directly, and again I saw no evidence. I then decided to test my hypothesis with an experiment. Mentally, I told myself that if I am correct that this woman is checking me out/is aroused by me (and if my assumptions about how arousal/AF attraction works are accurate) then she will directly turn her head to look at me if I start gazing at another woman in the classroom. So that’s what I did, I directly turned my head so that I was blatantly gazing at another woman at the front of the classroom (one that I actually felt no attraction to – she was clearly much less attractive than the woman I suspected was checking me out). I held my gaze on her for about five to ten seconds. Sure enough, the woman I suspected of checking me out then blatantly turned her head to look directly at me.

            Behavior is not a significant factor in assessing status – many extremely high status men are quiet and do not draw attention to themselves in public, and it is common for low and medium status men to act splashy in public, out of a desire to convince others they possess something they realize will not be readily perceived or granted them. Status signalling is commonly a reflection of status-anxiety, and very far from from an accurate signalling of the real thing.

            I think this is an area where, perhaps, we are using different terms to say the same thing. I agree that status signalling is a reflection of status-anxiety – and this is exactly what I would include when I say “behavior.” You can learn that obvious “status signalling” – for instance buying an extremely expensive dinner for a date to signal that you have lots of money or blatantly interrupting a man and talking down to him to “prove your dominance” – is unattractive and then take steps to eliminate that behavior. Of course, attempting to change your behavior and actually changing your behavior are two different things, and I feel like that is the main contention that most MGTOW tend to have with “game proponents.”

            They see “PUAs” attempting to change their behavior, but failing to do so, and then say “see, game doesn’t work.” In my opinion, however, this is a faulty argument – it’s not that “game” doesn’t work, it’s that the individual failed to properly alter his behavior. This IS a good case to say a specific method or technique doesn’t work – but to say that “game”, as a whole, is wrong based on the failed application of one particular methodology is poor argumentation in my mind.

            There are NUMEROUS theories and recommendations on how to behave that encompass “game”, and many of them contradict each other – sometimes in subtle ways and sometimes in mutually exclusive ways.

            Now this comment has gotten extremely long, so I’m going to cut it off here. I apologize if I’ve left it in a confusing state – I’ve already gone over the time I would normally devote to my lunch break, so I won’t really be doing any re-reading or editing.

          7. George says:

            Hi palleon.

            I still think the situation is far more complex than you’re ready to admit. And most of what you say does not really address the question. I also agree with you that women gve fairly obvious signs of intetest, but am again unclear how that’s connected to the question.

            I agree with you that women sleep with some men based on attraction, and others in e change for something, but the question is does the way a man behave affect sexual attraction.

            To give you an example of why it’s complex.

            Many guys grow up afraid and shy around women, then later in life learn that by devaluing women they gain the confidence to be social around them. Will farrell discussrs this. They then conclude that these “alpha” attitudes made women notice them. In their minds, the association between aggressive behavior and sucess with women is clear, but they are woefully mistaken about the precise mechanism.

            Another useful example is of the psychopath who is successful with women, the famous “dark triad” personality. In this case the researchers are as naive in interpreting the evidence as the clueless pua, which leads to the suspicion that both are driven by dysfunctional western cultural imperatives towards seeing what they wish.

            The pua, and often the researchets, conclude from the mere fact that dark triad types rack up many partners that these traits are uniquely alluring to women. Yet the tactics psychopaths use to seduce their victims makes clear the exact opposite is the truth.

            The psycopath goes to enormous lengths to hide his dark traits during the initial seduction phase and to simulate the exact opposite. He strives to be caring, kind, polite, charming – supposedly non alpha traits. Only when the victim is hooked does he reveal his dark side.

            It would seem, then, that the dark triad type himself, supposedly the apogee ofalpha, utterly rejects alpha traits as useful for seduction.

            The psychopath also carefully selects vulnurable women and hones his ability to detect them, and discards women because he is incapable of empathy.

            So – the brute fact that psychopaths rack up a high partner count is seen as an artefact of merely honing his ability to select vulnurable women, a disinterest in long term relationships, and an explicit and conscious rejection of so called alpha traits as counterproductive for seduction.

            Yet the dark triad personality is routinely held up by PUAS as well as researchers as a vindication for their tjeories, illustrating that association and causality are hard to decipher without lots of experience, an honest mind, and perhaps wisdom, and that seeing causality is often just a reflection of cultural biases or personal preoccupations and wish fulfillment fantasies.

            My case provides me with a rare, and thus perhaps useful, perspective. I’ve been a playboy for going on fifteen years, and during that time I underwent multiple shifts in mood, approach, attitufe, beliefs, and values. Most men don’t mutate as much as I have and won’t have the opportunity to see how radical shifts in behavior affect outcome.

            The answer:very little, if at all, with one exveption. I’ve been aloof, dominant, macho, superior, as well as the opposite, and what I have learned is two rhings.

            One, women will tolerate a fairly broad range of behavior without it having any impact. If you are too nervous and shy, it will harm you, if you are too arrogant and haughty – say the kind of behavior regularhly prescribed on roissy/heartiste – it will antagonize and harm you. As long as you are in “nirmal” range it won’t matter.

            Second, the one thing needful to realize your potential with women (not increase atraction, as I think that’s impossible) is to be socially “open”, pro-social, and socially “available” not closed off for intimacy and emotional contact, as intimacy is one of the main things women want from you.

            If you are able to be “charming”, ie very friendly, kind, loving, open, easy, and intimate – the opposite of “alpha” and the way psycopaths are at the beginning to seduce their victims – you will further grease the wheels, bit it’s hardly necessary.

            But nothing overcomes the unalterable physical facts of ypur physical appeal and money/status, as I have discoveted.

            I have gotten women being macho and dominant but within normal range (not the stupid stuff u c on roissy). Then a time came when I said screw this nonsense and explicitly and consciously dropped the whole big ego big man act and just stopped giving a shit about my image – I explicitly renounced “alpha” and ego and just stopped caring – and got to s of women that eay, and had way more fun and self respect.

            Nothing matters. Goid luck.

  5. George says:

    That was brilliant, thank you.

    While I’m not a mgtow, the sheer intellectual honesty and openness to ideas that you find among mgtow can be found nowhere else among anti-feminist men’s sites.

    I have been banned for making similar suggestions, much more mildly, on other men’s sites.

    The problem of human evil is a serious one, and many male/female problems are really just problems of human evil.

    Like all abstractions, things like evo-psyche are poor guides to dealing with a messy reality even though it captures some of the truth in broad outlines.

    Humans are contradictory creatures and you cannot ‘pluck out the heart’ of their mystery.

    Evo-psyche says guys compete and undermine each oher for women, yet I have never felt the urge to do so. Have I failed evo-psyche, or has evo-psyche failed to explain me? Yet I would be a fool to deny that many men behave this way. I have been on the receiving end of it.

    I have known women to financially support destitute lovers with no future prospects, and many women despise men with large muscles. What has evo-psyche to say about this?

    Like all elegant abstractions, it captures a portion of the truth, perhaps a broad tendency. And like all non-rigorous modern science (see Ionnides) it tends to be merely a reflection of prevailing biases, as is the case with most nutrition advice.

    The problem of evil is especially acute in modern times, with its emphasis on selfishness and lack of inhibition or restraint. We are breeding a society of character disturbed people. Already estimates of cluster B person laity disorder rates hover at 15-20 percent.

    PUA appeals to people with cluster B personality disorders who seek vindication for their natural tendencies. I don’t think it is actually about getting girls (as it doesn’t work, and would create empty and sterile relationships if it did work so that you might as well visit a prostitute if you’re just after physical relief. Yet PUAS are notoriously and curiously averse to prostitutuon).

    I wonder how much shittines women display is just human aggression and exploitation freed from restraint by modern conditions, and has nothing to do with timeless female ‘attraction’ modules, and that has its exact analogue in male shitinness seen across a range of fields like finance down to the way some men will pathetically undermine other men in front of women, rather than rely on their own genuine appeal.

    Emotionally open, generous men – all good qualities that can be a major source of joy – often fall prey to the character disturbed, often repeatedly. And our modern psychological climate which seeks to explain away evil, and claims all human aggression is a ‘defense mechanism’ rather than naked aggression that should be fought, renders many of us self-doubting and without the proper conceptual framework with which to defend against evil.

    1. Aaron says:

      Yep. Great comment.

      We are complex mix of genetics, learned experience(consciousness, awareness), and how we interact with our environment. And probably other factors known and unknown. Its a complicated mindfuck.

      1. George says:

        Yes, and so many people prefer simplifications to the chaos and mystery of reality, and the illusion of knowledge to really knowing.

  6. Mr. Kasshu says:

    This reminds of the time Sir. Barbarossaaaa talked about the male mother need. Men tend to asphix a goddess like quality to women, like they gave for their mothers. I throughly enjoyed the article, it gave a good perspective and to know our gynocentric tendencies is a great step to getting rid of those extra weeds growing on us. Thank you sir. RBK.

  7. Ajax says:

    Great article razor, i agree. miss your videos man

  8. Aaron says:

    “Self reflection, seeing what we really are, and how we are, and then making internal changes in ourselves, changes in our perception and attitudes, and then helping other men to also look within, change their perception and attitude, and when that spreads over our culture slowly but surely, it will cause a cultural shift, new cultural attitudes, new behaviors and values will come from that.”

    But this is why speculation is so useful. We live in a complex world: http://armstrongeconomics.com/archives/21577

    What is speculated on may be applicable to the individual. As it has for me a few times. Its not necessarily incorrect just that it doesnt explain all actions male or female take.

    I more or less agree with you, nutnI dont percieve a voluntary interaction as evil. This is where the difference in subjective definitions come into play. But youndid address the main point that have with all this talk.

    I get the feeling that when quite a few men in this community call women out as evil, they somehow see themselves as more virtuous and above women. And dont have the humility or honesty to admit that if environmental circumstances were different. Male behavior may be deemed more “evil” then their female counterparts. It just comes off as hypocritical and lacking awareness from my viewpoint.

    It seems that the men that do this tend to come to the community because they were raped financially and emotionally in court and still are today. So perhaps calling women evil gives them an ego boost and help them feel good?

    Its understandable if that’s the case. But part of me selfishly wants them to get over it. I feel its jolding them back.

    Thanks for the thoughtful article.

  9. bonus says:

    My issue with the idea of feeling superior to women is that I personally feel it to be a burden. Not something to brag about. I grew up in a very girl power culture and was disappointed at what most women I felt with turned out to be. I don’t think telling ourselves women are equal or letting go of the sense of superiority we may feel in relation to them will change things. Women will never start protecting men. Women will never stop manipulating men. They will never start having sex for the sake of sex without expecting something in return. Women will never start pumping out one invention and innovation after the next. Women will never take the reigns of civilization and try to propel us all forward. All of that will fall men. And when men manage to succeed, all while women berate and nag them, guess what. We are going to feel damn proud of it. We will smirk and brag about how women can’t do things right. Because it’s fucking true. Giving up our guise of invincibility and allowing our vulnerability to show won’t change women. It will only put us in a worse position

  10. jefaus06 says:

    The big problem, for me, in asserting that “all women are evil”, is the ease by which it is done. It is an appeal to emotions. It conversely asserts that “all men are good”.

    Occam’s razor can only go so far in simplifying something.

    And our “Razor” knows how far we can cut this notion down. And given his (lengthy) response, he has shown us that we should not do this.

    Detach your emotions when dealing with women. It was emotionally driven over-simplification by men that allowed for gynocentrism to flourish. We do not need to do the same again. Employ critical thought first, guys. Don’t fall into the trap of black-and-white thinking.

    All emotion driven actions are predictable, Blue pill simping is predictable. Red pill anger is predictable. Critical thought produces flexible outcomes for individual situations.

    MGTOW, think critically, be flexible and be unpredictable.

  11. MgToW says:

    Yes I think men and women can both be evil in different ways. With all due respect, I don’t think it’s quite as equal as you make it out though. You do imply that men are more altruistic and I think that’s true.

    The real nub of this issue to me comes down to honesty. It seems to me men can do the self examination necessary to KNOW where our negative traits are and admit them (both to ourselves and our partner) and seek to curb them. Fidelity is the big one here. In spite of men’s notorious high sex drive, women cheat at least as much, probably more than men. I’ve also never heard a man, married or not, deny he’s still attracted to other women, at least on some level. He knows it’s wrong to cheat and that our urges aren’t an excuse.

    Conversely, women are now confronted with the ways in which they are evil or how following their urges (like hypergamy) are damaging and exploitative of men. Yet I don’t hear from any women, EVER, about how they are doing the self examination necessary to change. I don’t hear ANY women speaking about their own impulses the way men do and I don’t see any women making any changes in their behavior.

    I’m reluctant to label Female Nature “evil” since she may just be acting unconsciously but once she becomes aware of it, if she simply denies it, shifts the blame, plays the victim, blames men, etc (as every woman does) then I DO think we can call THAT evil.

  12. Gri says:

    What’s-His-Face got some flack because he sounded a lot like cultural marxism conspiratards and that triggered some people. Thats my guess.

  13. Tim says:

    They day you were given access to a keyboard and a blog was a dark day for men. You had me riveted on human nature and then you gave up with “All’s fair in love and war, gents! Don’t be so prideful, guys! Give up your hubris, fellas! Don’t be so judgmental, boys! You’re evil, too! ” WTF!?

    You suck! You must really enjoy getting others into buying your misplaced fallacious regressions. Let me lay this out for you so you get it, chief:

    Both women and men like a good looking mate. Women dig fit, handsome men. Men dig fit, good looking women. But that’s where the biological similarities end, dumb ass.

    Men are superficial where a woman’s looks come into play, but that’s it. Men have no expectation that a woman will provide him resources not earned – nor sacrifice her life when his life is under threat. Women are superficial where men’s looks come into play, but they have the added superficiality of expecting that man either (1) make it easier for her to save money or (2) by virtue of his wealth (or sudden death), make it easier for her to take money (see no-fault divorce). Men didn’t make women this way, DUFUS! It’s been programmed into men that they’re to provide for and protect women, AND STILL RESPECT THEM AS EQUALS AT THE SAME TIME! You don’t get it! The patriarchy is composed of the men at the top – AND IT BENEFITS THE MEN AT THE TOP TO KEEP THE MEN AT THE BOTTOM EITHER DEAD OR POOR. WHY? MORE PUSSY FOR THEM!

    For all of time, women have used men to their advantage. For all of time, men with advantage have used men of less advantage to gain advantage with women. When you drive down the road, everything you see was and still is built by men. Now that there’s a way to import cheap foreign manual labor and/or ship traditional male jobs overseas, and now that jobs are more favorable to those that don’t like to muss their hair or break their nails, men find themselves in a bit of a pickle. WHO CREATED THIS ENVIRONEMNT? THE PATRIARCHY in support of the GYNOCRACY! Traditional male jobs have been shipped to male slave labor markets and jobs in the US that men enjoy (STEM) are being increasingly filled by cheaper foreign H1B visa imports – OR GIVEN AWAY TO THE CHINESE AND/OR RUSSIANS. WHO PERFORMS ALL OF THE DECENT, MIDDLE CLASS LABOR JOBS IN THE US NOW? LOW WAGE HISPANIC MEN! WHO THREW MOST MEN UNDER THE BUS? THE PATRIARCHY! FOR WHOM? THE HYPERGYNOCENTRISTS (FEMINISTS)! WHY DID THESE MEN DO THIS? SO THAT THEY COULD BE ELECTED/RE-ELECTED! WHY? THE PATRIARCHY IS THOSE MEN WITH LOTS OF MONEY – AND THEY’RE TERRIFIED THAT WOMEN WILL DEPRIVE THEM OF THEIR MONEY. WHY? POWERFUL MEN WITH MONEY BECOME VICTIMS OF LOWER CLASS MEN WITHOUT MONEY WHEN POWERFUL MEN WITH MONEY LOSE THEIR POWER AND WEALTH BY NOT PLEASING THE GYNOCRACY!

    Your little fairy tale on the way the world works doesn’t fool me in the least. I find you deeply simplistic, servile and naive. I’m shocked so many here bought into it already. Get over your women worship and stop filling these guys’ heads with BS that only makes sense to white knights and women, COWARD!

    How do men change the balance of power in their favor – now that they’ve been brutalized by the gynocracy and patriarchy for centuries? Never sign the contract that gives women ultimate power to destroy your life. What is that contract? THE MARRIAGE CONTRACT! With each year that passes, ever more misandric polices come into play that redistribute men’s power to woman. What are some examples? The VAWA, Yes Means Yes, SNAP, WIC, Affirmative Action, women only scholarships, alimony, child support (alimony light), Title IX, etc, etc, etc. The list of female friendly – white knight enacted – redistributive programs are endless. These programs, and others like them, are designed to force the patriarchy (men in power) to redistribute most men’s wealth and power to women – through force of federal and state law – THROUGH THREAT OF GUNPLAY AND IMPRISONMENT. The UK is now working on legislation that gives cohabiting women rights to their boyfriend’s assets and income if he breaks up with her! YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS SHIT UP! They call it the “Cohabitation Rights Bill”. “Yes Means Yes” does what all other gynocentrically induced, white knight enforced laws do. What’s that?! IT REMOVES MEN’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND GIVES WOMEN EASY ACCESS TO MEN’S POWER AND WEALTH! How? Through civil suits, the removal of men’s rights to presumption of innocence, the removal of men’s rights to due process and the destruction of the patriarchy (fraternities). What defines the women’s movement? (1) The destruction of the patriarchy, (2) freeing women from the SLAVERY of marriage and (3) women’s sexual liberation. Who are “the patriarchy” women want to destroy? Lower class men. Who are the real patriarchy? Wealthy men, FOOL!

    Women are not sugar and spice and everything nice. Women are TRULY EVIL. The atrocities committed against men by the gynocracy and the patriarchy (rich, powerful men) needs to end at the gallows. Your faint hearted, feminine explanation of fairness and equality does the hundreds of millions of destroyed men before you a deep, shameful disservice – FEMINIST!

    1. Tim says:

      RazorBlade Kandy is a woman.

      I wasn’t aware of that until just now.

      1. Rathernotsay says:

        I think you missed his point, when someone has power without responsibility the person abuses it. With women’s ability to manipulate men, they will go as far as they can to benefit themselves, this is innately human, not just female.

        When men no longer give up so much for women gender dynamics will change, likely reversing the laws, or not, its hard to say

    2. dude says:

      This guy clearly has a point, look at all these caps.

  14. Tim says:

    Ever hear of women protesting en masse the devastatingly high suicide rate by men? Know why they don’t? I do.

    Ever hear of women protesting en masse the 95% + payments from men to women in alimony and child support? Know why they don’t? I do.

    Ever hear of women protesting the astronomically high rate of male deaths in the workplace when compared to women? Know why they don’t? I do.

    Ever hear of women protesting en masse that men pay for dates, movies, drinks, etc? Know why they don’t? I do.

    Ever hear of women protesting the branding of men as cowards for not going to war for women and women’s children? Know why they don’t? I do.

    Marriage, for women, is the most highly paid form of prostitution – Women know this very well. Marriage is the criminal exploitation of men by women. Women get to take the man’s property, his future income, destroy his life and easily move onto the next victim.

    Women are sugar and spice and everything nice – NOT!

  15. Tim says:

    Know how women shame, manipulate and humiliate men into taking their side? Know how white knights manipulate, shame and humiliate men into taking their side?

    I do.

    Shame, manipulation and humiliation are meant to keep those being conned in a state of submission with vulnerable wallets.

  16. Tim says:

    Know why some women excoriate other women for wearing one piece bathing suits while others insist that nipple and butt floss is the be all – end all? I do.

    Know why women dye their hair? I do.

    Know why women don’t tell their age? I do.

    Know why women enlarge their breasts? I do.

    Know why women get Botox injections? I do.

    Know why women wear padding in their bras? I do.

    Know why women wear makeup? I do.

    Know why women wear false eyelashes? I do.

    Know why women pretend to be afraid of spiders and mice? I do.

    It’s all about manipulating men. It’s all about duping the next, naive fool into marriage (male financial rape and/or suicide).

    The women’s movement is about (1) destroying the patriarchy, (2) freeing women from the slavery of marriage and (3) sexually liberating women.

    The three books every male should read: (1) The Myth of Male Power, (2) The Manipulated Man and (3) Stand by Your Manhood.

    Don’t you fall for her, sweet pea. She’ll ruin your life 1000 times over. Memorize what you’ve read here. Never forget.

  17. Golden Eagle-owl says:

    “It’s like male psychology is a roof, and women are the rain, and my goal isn’t to keep harping on wet the rain is and whining about all the property damage caused by the wet rain leaking through the roof, I would rather shine a light on the holes in the roof and say “that’s where the leak is””

    Agreed. All it takes is for us men to collectively refuse the exploitation to end most this shit. Becoming a MGHOW is a way to directly address and fix those issues in one’s own life. But… like the rain is wet, women are still evil.

    Here’s the thing, good/evil is subjective, so when someone says women are evil, or selfish, or dangerous or whatever, basically means “women do things that don’t align with my best interests.”. There is also the issue of empathy, or lack of it. To address that i’ll just copy a comment I made on a recent Stardusk video:

    “As I see it the argument that could be made against “human nature is understandable” is: by virtue of being part of an intelligent and conscious species, a person would be expected to have a certain level of empathy for another, to see things through their eyes, and understand the consequences that come from the actions. But the thing is, empathy falls short, since our default state is one of selfishness and self-interest. It is damn hard (not impossible, but hard) to convince anyone to make a sacrifice for the sole benefit of another.”

    1. Ob says:

      We can say that women are evil in the sense that they enjoy to see men dying and suffering for them and dispise men that try to protect their life.

      The key is that the power of women does not come from their sexual value but from their lies. Her sexual appearance is only a distraction that stops you to see the whole picture.

      At the moment that you understand that everything that comes from a woman is a manipulation (benevolent or malevolent, it depends) you get freed from the matrix. There is no such thing as truth of false in the world of women.

      Just don’t listen to what women say don’t pay attention to their look (unless you are looking for some sexual prspect). Just go your own way.

  18. Alex says:

    This article was too long and not focused. I think we should discuss the nature of evil before we attribute it to anyone. Female nature should be a centrL part of the discourse but I do not think hypergamy is morally evil. Men are suckers and they empower gynocentrism. Let our moral indignation fall on male enablers.

  19. Lord of minerals says:

    This made me re-watch your video on prostitution, and I’ll definitely be contemplating my vulnerabilities and biases while on my jog this evening.

    Self-reflection is valuable. As I often say; knowledge is power – power to make choices. Self-knowledge, therefore, is the power to make choices regarding the self.

    And there’s quite a lot of power in self-mastery through honest self-reflection, because (as the saying goes) you can’t cheat an honest man.

  20. Andreas says:

    TL;DR women can be evil, but never forget men can be evil tooooooooo. Razorblade (=feminine) logic -> both genders are exactly as evil. Conclusions? 1) If men can’t handle women claiming men being evil, there’s something wrong with the men (as a roof? Wtf?). 2) men can’t ever adress feminine evil, but should introspect forever 3) women aren’t restricted to behave as decent human beings and above rules don’t apply to them, because reasons. Oh, that’s right, sorry, because rain.
    Brilliant, RBK.

  21. Rathernotsay says:

    Reading the comments, a lot of the people seem to be making straw-men, sigh,

    Very good article, most of which was already common to me, but very good explanation of such, Though there are neurological difference between men and women, but a lot of that is quite new evidence and not hugely validated

    One commenter mentioned the empathy gap, but as described and as the researchers mentioned can likely be explained by environment, maybe not completely, but largely

  22. Tim says:

    Ever been fishing? Every fisherman knows the basics. What are those basics? You have to present the lure (often quite elaborate), wiggle it about and, once the fish bites, set the hook and reel it in. Then you just skin it, remove its spine and bake or fry. Fish are consumables.

    Fish are fairly innocent creatures. They’re only after one thing. Conversely, the fisherman often go to extreme lengths to catch the fish and go even further to determine the level of life-destruction with which the fish will endure. Will the fish be let go (catch and release) or will the fish get metabolized by the hungry predator?

    1. joe says:

      you are wise my friend

  23. Pellaeon says:

    Finally finished the article. I was worried at first, particularly in lieu of the last article RBK wrote here, that he was advocating a stance of “Men, give up trying to fix your problems and just adopt a victim complex like women do.”

    I’m glad to see him take it back to personal responsibility in the end. I wholeheartedly agree that there is nothing you can do (at least not directly) to change other people. You can only control how you choose to act and react to given stimuli (including your own feelings). I still take issue with some of the talking points, but I can definitely agree with the overall message.

    Thanks for the post RBK!

  24. Gabriel Stan says:

    Actually, I haven’t detected any inconsistencies and contradictions in this article. One of the best works I’ve seen so far on this site.

  25. Jive Turkey says:

    Great article! You are off the chain, man! Gynocentrism exists because we allow it to exist. as long as there are white knights men will always get taken advantage of.

  26. marlon says:

    Men and women abuse power, yes.
    But men have proven themselves willing to sacrifice for the greater good of family, children and women, and even other men so I’ll take the side of men.

  27. Rickard says:

    Great article RBK! I agree with pretty much 100%. I hope you get back to video making soon.

  28. TheHonestTruthOfAll says:

    With so much more women today that are very high maintenance, independent, selfish, spoiled, and very greedy, really speaks for itself why many of them are Evil.

  29. mr. terrell says:

    I love this article, it verify some shit I was feeling, also open me in different ways on how to deal with women.

  30. imgur says:

    This is also possible if they offer SEO as part of their service.
    You will also need to delegate your domain name to the hosting space, details on this
    are provided by your hosting provider. Just – Host is
    loaded with tools that will help you with every need
    you have.

  31. OG_Roota says:

    This is surely a great post, but bro, write a book. This is the internet. You lost 80% of your audience after the first 3000 words.

  32. Carl says:

    Its all very much true , basic facts that men will eventually see . its all a matter of how much crap one is willing to put up with . if the women can do better , they eventually will if just out of boredom.

  33. Carl says:

    I say if a man is able to raise a child and wants one then his choice is his own . In saying that and giving our laws it is impossible to adopt alone and highly impossible to succeed in having one out of marriage without suffering and losing custody if not reputation . Marriage is a result of pure Evil jealousy decided upon all men as the price of fornicating , and seen as a security for really only that reason alone its a public I owe you for exclusive rights to a women’s vagina . Never ever can anything Holy be gotten from this discusting, outdated contract. I’m 39 and practice what I believe . I have also refrained from procreating for these very reasons my generation has lived with.

  34. John Pierre says:

    BECAUSE THEY WANT IT HARD NOT STUPID,SELFISH,EMOTIONAL THEY WANT TO TEST MAN AS A MAN NOT AS A CHILD BUT FUCK THAT SHIT I DON’T LOVE WOMEN THAT ARE LIKE THAT BUT I LOVE WOMEN THAT ARE FLEXIBLE SAME LIKE YOU ASKED IN YOUR QUESTION AND I WISH ALL WOMEN ARE LIKE THIS AND YOU WOMEN LISTEN TO ME ”STOP!!!! THINKING YOURSELF SMART WE MEN DON’T PLAY GAMES WITH US BECAUSE WOMEN YOU ARE SEXUAL AND COMPLICATED CREATURE ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT GOD CREATED EVE EVE ATE THE APPLE OF GOD THEN SATAN TEMPTED EVE TO EAT OF THIS FRUIT THEN SHE ATE IT!!!!! STUPID EVE FROM THE TREE BECAUSE SHE DIDN’T KNOWED THAT THE FRUIT IS THE FRUIT OF THE DAMN FUCK SHIT DICKHEAD SATAN!!!!!!! AND STOP PLAYING HIDE AND SEEK/TIC TAC TOE GAMES WOMEN WE KNOW VERY WELL WE MEN WE MEN ARE STRONG IN BODY,SPIRIT, AND MENTALLY WE HAVE THE AUTHORITY YOU HAVE TO BE SILENT YEAH!! ITS THE BIBLE WHAT IT SAYS NOT ME I DO SAY IT WE MEN ARE CHOSEN BY GOD YOU WOMEN ARE CHOSEN BY SATAN BY HELL WTF?!? IS WRONG WITH YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE EVIL YES YOU ARE!!!!!!!! AND IF YOU DON’T STOP IT I WILL NEVER TO TALK TO WOMEN FOR MY WHOLE GOD DAMN LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MEN IS WISE MEN IS WISE MEN ARE WISE YOU WOMEN ARE WHAT YOU ARE MONEY SUCKERS BLOOD SUCKERS GOOD SWIPERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU CAN’T CHANGE YOUR SELF BECAUSE ITS THE BIBLE YES THE BIBLE CONTROLS EVERY!! SINGLE!! THING!! ON THE EARTH THE UNIVERSE,AIR,EARTH AND WARS ETC ETC ETC ETC ITS ALL BY GOD AND JESUS CHRIST AND HE IS LETTING TO HAPPEN AND GOING ON BECAUSE HE IS THE CREATOR OF EVERY!!!!!!!!!!!!!THING!!!!!!!!!! YOU UNDERSTAND?!? OR NO?!?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN?!?!?!? YOU WOMEN ARE BLOODY CREATURES BUT GOD IS ABOVE ALL AND HE IS WATCHING YOU ALSO LASTLY!!!! YOU WOMEN SHOULD AND MUST REMAIN SILENT FOREVER FROM NOW TILL THE FOREVERNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IN THE NAME OF HOLY JESUS CHRIST SON OF GOD!!! AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ONLY DESERVE TO CLEAN THE HOME NOTHING MORE EAT,SLEEP AND CLEAN ONLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS IS YOUR WHOLE LIFE AND AFTER YOU DIE YOU GO TO RED HELL FIRE FOR ETERNITY TO RED HELL FIRE DON’T EVER THINK YOUR ARE SMARTER THAN MEN WE MEN ARE THE BEST WE MADE EVERYTHING ON EARTH WE MADE ROADS,COMPUTERS,TRAFFIC LIGHT,LANES,BUILDINGS,NEW YORK,COUNTRIES,NATIONS,MILITARY,WEAPONS ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC YOU WHAT YOU MADE??!? ONLY PROBLEMS ONLY HEADACHE ONLY GAMES ONLY LOSE ONLY BLOOD SUCKING DICK SUCKING ONLY SHIT AND AIR EATING ONLY SEX,BIG FAKE BOOBS,ASS AND PUSSY PLASTIC SURGERIES ON YOUR LIPS,FACE AND BELLY SHY ON YOUR DAMN FUCKING BLOOD JEALOUSLY SHOW OFF STUPIDITY YOUR BRAINS YOU DON’T GIVE A CHANCE FOR A MAN TO FOCUS CONCENTRATE FROM YOUR BODY WHEN YOU SPEAK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ARE EMOTIONAL,STUPID,SEXUAL,JEALOUS,SHOW OFF,GREED,VILE AND SNAKE CREATURE AND THE BIGGEST EXAMPLE IS YOUR PUSSY IS THE SHIT BITCH THE BAPHOMET IN YOUR PUSSY SYSTEM MENSTRUATION CYCLE ALL THAT SHIT!!!!!!! IS BY THE DEVIL AND HIS TEMPTATIONS AND ALL THE TEMPTATIONS AND THE MAJORITY OF THEM IS FROM YOU OF THE EVIL SEXUAL WHISPERING SPEAKING,DOING EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!! IS FROM YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SHY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GOD IS EVERYWHERE ANYWHERE HE IS EVEN NEXT TO YOU WATCHING YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DAMNNNNN IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GOD CURSE YOU GOD FIRE YOU GOD SLAM YOU IN RED HELL FIRE FOREVER FOREVER BITCHES,WHORES,TOTTOS, PROTISUTE,CELEBRITIES IN RED DAMN IT HELL FIRE FOR ETERNITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU DESERVE ONLY SPIT ON YOUR FACE NOTHING MORE THAN THAT FROM THE LAST THE END OF THE SPEECH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THATS BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!! THAT’S CRAP SHIT THAT’S FUCKING BIG DICK SHIT ON MY DICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ITS NOT HUMANITY BUT ITS ANIMALITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS NOT THE WAY OF DEALING WITH MEN LEARN BITCHES LEARN WHORES HOW TO DEAL WITH MEN THEN COME HERE COMMENT WHAT EVER YOU WANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DAMN ON YOUR HEARTS DAMN ON YOUR 60 MILLION TRILLION HEARTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOW GREEDY YOU ARE WOMEN HOW VILE YOU ARE WOMEN HOW SELFISH AND STUPID AND IGNORANT YOU ARE AND ARROGRANT SHAME ON YOU SHAME ON THIS ATTITUTE MEN!!!! IS WORKING HARD HIS LOVE HIS EMOTIONS HIS SHIT HIS BALLS HIS MONEY HIS HOME MEN MADE EVERYTHING ON THIS DAMN IT PLANET EARTH HE MADE THE HOUSES VILLIAS THE WEAPONS THE ROADS THE STREETS THE SHOES THE BOATS THE YATCH HE CAN SHAKE MOUNTIANS!!!!!!!!!!!! WITH HIS VOICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHEN HE SCREAMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE ARE REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU WOMEN ARE WHAT?!?!?!?!? YOU ARE WHAT HUH??!??!??! TELL ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU MADE ONLY PROBLEMS,HEADACHES,DRAMAS,STUPIDITY,DUMBNESS,SEX,PORN AND FUCKACHE FOR THE WHOLE ENTRIE HUMANITY FOR THE SPIRIT FOR THE GOD FOR JESUS FOR EVERYTHING AND WHEN I’M SAY THAT I SAY STRIAGHTY TO HOLY MARY YEAH I SAY IT!!!! BEYOND SHE DON’T HAVE SINS AT ALL TO YOUR SISTERS,YOUR MOTHERS YOUR GIRLSFRIENDS YOUR BITCHES YOUR FEMALE COUSINS YOUR FEMALE GRANDMOTHER YOUR DRAOUGHTER YOUR GRANDMOTHER OF YOUR DAUGHTER AND ALLL ALL ALLL GIRLS AND WOMEN OF THE WHOLE ENTIRE PLANET YOU WOMEN ARE BITCHES BITCHES SLUTS SLUTS WHORES WHORES FORBIDDEN TO YOU TO STAY ON EARTH AND I WISHED GOD HAD REMOVED ARMS FROM WOMEN SO THAT THEY DON’T DO EVIL THINGS ON EARTH TO MEN LIKE THE STORY OF ADAM AND EVE WHEN GOD SAW SNAKE TEMPTING EVE THEN HE GOT MAD ON IT HE TOLD HER ”YOU ARE THE CURSED YOU WILL STAY FOREVER WITHOUT YOUR DAMNS LEGS FROM NOW AND FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!” YOU KNOW WHAT I’M SAYING AND MEANING?!? NOW ANSWER ME!!! OR BE SILENT AND WORK AT HOME ONLY CLEAN,SLEEP AND EAT ONLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DUMBER DUMB LADIES AND WOMEN YOU THINK YOU ARE SMARTER THAN US!!!!!!?!??!! YOU ARE NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND YOU WILL NEVER BE BECAUSE GOD CREATED WE MEN IN HIS IMAGE BUT GOD CREATED WOMAN NOT IN HIS IMAGE BUT IN THE IMAGE OF SATAN/DEVIL HIMSELF FROM THE FUCKING SHIT RED HELL FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!! AMEN IN THE NAME OF HOLY JESUS CHRIST THE SON OF ONLY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND YOU WILL NEVER REACH TO HEAVEN NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BUT IN RED HELL FIRE ETHERNITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT YOU DID GOOD TO US WE MEN?!??!?!? AND TO THE MEN SOCIETY EXCEPT SCRAMBLING OF THE SOCIETY WHILE WE MEN WE MADE SUCCESS RICH AND WISENESS ON EARTH WE PREACHED THE GOSPEL YOU WOMEN YOU PREACHED YOUR PUSSIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND ARGUE WITH ME IF YOU ARE A REAL WOMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE MEN WE CONTROL EVERYTHING THAT WE MADE AND GOD CONTROLS OF WHAT HE CREATED SUCH AS NATURE,AIR,FOREST ETC ETC ETC ETC ETC AND IF THERE IS NO FRESH AIR FOR US FROM YOU WOMEN STOPPING TO BREATH WE WILL HOLD AND SWIPE YOU AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU UNDERSTAND?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!? WE ARE SUPER EXTREMELY SERIOUS CREATURES ON EARTH AND LOOK HOW MANY WORDS I TYPED BUT THIS IS NOTHING THIS IS NOTHING BECAUSE I CAN STILL TYPE TILL 11 IN THE MORNING THAT’S WHY WE ARE HARDWORKING CREATES NOT LIKE LIMITED CREATURES THAT ARE COMPLICATED AND SEXUAL WHICH ARE ADDICTED TO SEX YOU CAN’T TYPE LIKE ME!!!!! YOU CAN’T REACH ME BUT ME I CAN HOLD YOU CATCH FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! STICKABLE AND STUCKABLE BESIDE YOUR DAMN ASSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU GET ANGRY WE GET MAD AND CRAZY LIKE A HOT LAVA BURING RED HELL FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ONLY LISTEN,WATCH AND BE SILENT OF US CLEAN THE HOMES AND FUCK YOURSELFS WHICH EACH OTHERS FEMALE-TO-FUCKING-FEAMLE LESBANINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! UNDERSTAND?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!? WE ARE SUPER EXTREMELY SERIOUS CREATURES ON EARTH AND LOOK HOW MANY WORDS I TYPED BUT THIS IS NOTHING THIS IS NOTHING BECAUSE I CAN STILL TYPE TILL 11 IN THE MORNING THAT’S WHY WE ARE HARDWORKING CREATES NOT LIKE LIMITED CREATURES THAT ARE COMPLICATED AND SEXUAL WHICH ARE ADDICTED TO SEX YOU CAN’T TYPE LIKE ME!!!!! YOU CAN’T REACH ME BUT ME I CAN HOLD YOU CATCH FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! STICKABLE AND STUCKABLE BESIDE YOUR DAMN ASSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU GET ANGRY WE GET MAD AND CRAZY LIKE A HOT LAVA BURING RED HELL FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ONLY LISTEN,WATCH AND BE SILENT OF US CLEAN THE HOMES AND FUCK YOURSELFS WHICH EACH OTHERS FEMALE-TO-FUCKING-FEAMLE LESBANINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ANIMALS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! & FULLFITS PUSSIES CATS AND SNAKES EVIL SATAN DEVIL ILLUMINATI FREEMASON BLOOD RITUAL CREATURES ARE THE WOMEN FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IN RED HELL FIRE LIKE I SAID FOREVER IN ETHERINITY IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST SON OF ONLY BEGGOTEN GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ARE YOU SERIOUS?!?!?!? WOMEN ARE THE COMPLLICATORS OR THE COMPLICATORS JUST THE MOBILE PHONE AND THE CAR WOMEN ALWAYS PLAY GAMES ALWAYS LOVE TO TRAP AND USE AND FIND SEVERAL 100,000000000000000 WAYS TO FAIL AND FALL MEN WITH ANYTHING FROM KNIFE FROM SHOUTING FROM ESCAPING AND MANY MANY OTHER REASON BUT THEY CAN’T BECAUSE MEN IS CHOOSEN BY GOD BUT YOU WOMEN ARE NOT CHOOSEN BY GOD BUT BY FUCK!! BOY!! SATAN THE DEVIL HIMSELF HE WANTS THE AUTHORITY OVER US OVER WOMEN OVER THE EARTH USING LUCIFER’S MANUIPLITION PLAYING WITH US OUR BRIANS LIKE A DOLLS IN THE STAGE FOR THE KIDS WAKE UP WOMEN!!!! WAKE UP hUMANITY!!!!! WAKE UP NATURE!!!!! WAKE UP MEN!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!!!WAKE UP!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!!!WAKE UP!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!!!WAKE UP!!!!! WAKE UP!!!!!! FOR GOD AND JESUS CHRIST SAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE MEN WE WILL GO TO SKY BLUE HEAVEN CLOUD ETHERNITY IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST BUT YOU WOMEN YOU WILL GO TO RED HELL FIRE SMOKE BLACK FOREVER ETHERLY BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS AND ITS TRUE JUST LIKE THE ANIMALS!!!!! ANIMALS AIN’T GOT SOULS LIKE HUMANS BUT ONLY FLESH AND GOD IS AGAINST THE FLESH AND BLOOD SO WE WILL BE LIKE THAT IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST SON OF ONLY HOLY BEGOTTEN GOD!!!!!!!! FOREVER ETHERLY AMEN !!!!!!!!

  35. Hedon says:

    Wow! I’m surprised I was late to this. Had to bookmark it. This is a masterpiece. Your Picasso.

  36. Evilprostitute says:

    I agree with alot of what you say. You seem to have alot of intuitive ability. I was mostly very good, a very beautiful woman but I didn’t know it, nor did I want to be full of myself. I was humble, loving, honest, selfless, empathetic, thoughtful, grateful etc. I did not care about looks nor money. Also was a devout Christian. Anyone who knew me spoke highly of me and said what a good person I was. And what happened? I came to know that most people aren’t that good. Friends of any gender disappear when you most need them. They betray. And men. My husband became abusive, I divorced. Most men ID meet, even at church, were after sex and would create any type of persona to try to get it. I got my heart broken plenty, got strung along, cheated on, etc. Finally, at 26 I decided that miss good girl is done. I broke up with my bf, quit dating altogether and became an escort. I’ve not looked back. I’ve also met men that have been hurt too many times and that’s why they call escorts. Two bitter cynics having a good time! I’m still somewhat good. I’m pretty altruistic in general and generous. I’m friendly with my clients. But I no longer trust anyone and I like that I now have the upper hand. Men can’t hurt nor disappoint me anymore. Occasionally I find myself getting a bit attached. Miss nice girl wants to come back! Then I slap the bitch in the face and ask her what do you want? Good money or more heartbreak? Then she shuts up😁 we need to just look at each other realistically like you mentioned. Yet when we do,honestly do, were all just a bunch of prostitutes and clients😕😕

  37. Unilantern says:

    I think this is a well written article and I can tell you that society does pressure women to be this way and ive been fighting my gender role socialization all my life. The thing about womens sexuality and them being less interested then men may not be biological, a lot of that is due to the pressure to keep ones legs closed and set a price and when you refuse you are told you are a slut or being used etc. The culture wants to control the person who can have a baby and land the family with a mouth to feed at a young age so females develop a lot of shame around their sexuality. If culture stopped this men would gain some sexual power from women, I know it does not take me long to sleep with a man once I’m with him and I know that’s bc I made an attempt to reject my programming and more women are doing the same now. Some may be holding onto some of the old patterns to get things and also bc they fear how men will view them for liking sex.

    Women are not capable of loving men bc men wont let them have enough agency to do so, when women develop the ability to fully love they also have the ability to fully not to and also when women develop fully human men are incapable of loving them. Its a horrible reality but it can be fixed bc reducing how much we add to sex difference and how much we punish similarity can be altered. The tradcon right contribute a lot to magnifying sex differences and putting the sexes on different wave lengths to a degree that separates them from each other and from full humanity as full humanity has enough traits of the other sex to be able to understand them.

  38. I like people but I hate society says:

    I am sorry you have considered that women are evil.
    Stereotypes are sometimes useful, but when trying to find the truth, they are rarely so.
    There are selfish men and women, no doubt. An evil societal structure encourages and promotes this sort of self-centered, money-loving, fame-desiring attitude.
    However, there are also men and women who are not evil, but are misguided – there is a difference between one who knows they are doing wrong and continues to do so, and one who is seeking right but has not found it, and so continues to do what they do not know is ‘wrong’.
    Decent human beings are not given as much attention as attention-seeking idiots, so don’t expect to find examples of good men and women in the media.
    If we truly want to identify what is evil, then we must be true to our approach – you should consider the significance of operant and classical conditioning – what stories are being sold to the youth?
    Even in your own writing, you show your own influenced mindset – holding Pamela Anderson to be a good looking person – does that mean for one to be good looking they must have breast augmentation, botox, fillers and makeup? Must they present themselves in public as they do upon waking? Obviously this is not what is encouraged.

    Do not confused what is biologically inherent, with what is the result of schemes constructed by marketers and psychologists and other “experts” over time.

    I consider ignorance to be evil – but that’s just me. We each have our own take on it.

  39. OKKAYESSS says:

    Yes. Women are evil. They are the Devil. They are Satan. They are the Dark Forces. The YIN which sucks in sperm (or light) and gives birth. The female reproductive system is symbolised as Jesus on the Cross and Baphomet. (The fallopian tubes are Jesus’ outstretched arms and baphomet’s horns.)Jesus is Satan is Woman. Christmas is all about the family. Family and reproduction is woman’s domain. If you worship Jesus, you worship Satan, you worship woman. The woman in red is the devil, just as Jesus bleeds on the cross, menstruating. Satan is the Princess of Darkness, the black hole of every galaxy in the yoniverse. She is the Matrix, the mother. She is the Great Whore who rides the beast of church and state. She is the dark force that enslaves the light in her system, all circulating around her, sucking in sperm and giving birth. She’s a baby-making machine. The Wheel of Samsara is the Spindle Whorl. The Whore keeps spinning her web of creation like a spider. Fuckin Evil Bitch.

  40. OKKAYESSS says:

    The true love from women is reserved for the child. It’s best to stay a mommy’s boy then? How can that kind of love be found in a girlfriend or wife? Do you not automatically turn beta? Laying on your woman’s breast being cradled in her loving arms. Do not all men in marriage and relationships have a many-angled relationship? Is she your bratty little sister, mother, friend, and sexual outlet all rolled into one? Or is she your enemy? The thorn in your side. The constrictor. The whore turns into a mother. Her priority switches from her lover to her baby. She always desires to have that baby. For what purpose? Just to create more and more of us? Birth, death, the cycle continues, youthful beings replenishing the dying. For what objective? Woman’s purpose is to keep birthing. Her reproductive system rules this earth. This world is run by the mother. The mother is the matrix. The illuminati symbols. All sexual. The one-eye? It’s the pussy. The BLACK LODGE. Females are the black magicians. Men are the forces of light. The snake/cock in her garden/pussy. She continues to eat the fruit (sperm). Why Is the baby in mother’s arms screaming? Was it not heaven to fall sound asleep in mother’s arms? Are we not all submerged in her Milky Way? Blissfully asleep? Is MGTOW an escape from the universe? The mandelbrot figure looks uncannily like a seated buddha. BLACK. It has a shapely ass. Is the buddha female too? Can we transcend the whole universe and all galaxies simply by taking our hands off our dicks and destroying lust for women? For what purpose? Is that the real freedom we want to taste? To not be controlled by woman/the dark forces/satan/the devil/the lady in red/Jesus.

  41. And That Is The Truth says:

    Most of them nowadays do have a very severe mental problem especially when many of us good innocent men will try to start a conversation with them and then they will Curse at us for no reason at all which most of them are real pathetic losers anyway. And i do have to say that the women in the past really did put these women today to real shame altogether as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *