Too often we are given explanations by all manner of pussy pass-ologists for the state of feminism and modern gender interaction that completely absolve the human beings that support feminism in it’s current form in one way or another, far flung nonsense about the “Fabian school” or cultural marxism abounds, and I wish to start forming a pushback to these talking points in hopes of showing how incomplete and inadequate they are in terms of a model of explaining the interactions between men and women. One of the most common talking points that are uttered by these people is that all of this can be described via the catch all of “marxism” and the various sub derivatives of marxism that they have thought up to cover a massive assortment of human behaviors. It goes a bit like this:
Marxism has been repurposed, and the theories of class struggle have been reapplied to men and women with devastating effect, instituting a slow motion path to dystopia where academic institutions, governments, and many other social institutions are all infiltrated by malevolent fabian socialists and their ilk. This is classic, an attempt to find an elite group to transfer blame for situations that we as human beings are responsible for. Below I propose a scenario that may help some of you understand how the natural tendencies of the human species could easily make an equivalent situation to class struggle organically, without the conspiracists equivalent of intelligent design.
The scenario I propose is when the governments that we as human beings erect become interplanetary instead of international, if we assume that at this point “cultural marxism” is a phenomenon relegated to the pages of history, if, for example at this point we imagine a civil war between colonizers of the moon… Lunarians we’ll call them, and Earthlings took place in which, much like the American revolution, the Lunarians won their independence from their mother country, or mother planet in this case. Let’s say that the vast stores of helium-3 deposited on the moon for eons provided these Lunarians with an almost inexhaustible supply of energy spawning a golden age of Lunarian renaissance and technological development, while the earth was forced to maintain its precarious dependency on fossil fuel.
Would there not be people, Earthlings in this case, who would label all Lunarians as an economically hostile class who uses its position of relative wealth in comparison to the Earthlings to subjugate and oppress them? would the Earthlings develop ideas that labeled Lunarians as innate oppressors and Earthlings as innate victims? and would there be people that ignore all the great achievements that the Lunarians were able to accomplish and all the aid they give to the Earthlings and the fact that they now benefit from protection from the Lunarian military, just in case that militant martian colony attacks earth?
That, gentleman would be “marxism”, developing independent of Karl Marx, or I should say rather that this would be an example of natural in group bias that is innate to the human condition. This is a scenario that could easily unfold even if Karl Marx had never existed. Remember, that if feminism is a result of things such as cultural marxism or leftism or what have you, then we’d have to ask ourselves, why there was a middle man, or should I say middle woman involved? Cultural marxism, according to these people set up women as a victim class and men as the oppressor class and various methods by which resources could then be extracted from the oppressing class to the oppressed class were devised and instituted. So, the state uses women as a means of extracting wealth from men and in this scenario there is a middle man, the female sex. Copious amounts of time and energy is being devoted toward courting female favor, at least politically speaking, in order to get them to part with the disposable income that men provide them.
The same could not be said in reverse, you could not have gotten men to see themselves as being victims of women, you could not have gotten them to divorce en masse, and you could not have gotten them to pursue laws which steal wealth, health and prosperity from women. What i’m getting at here is that if these cultural marxists did anything to influence or engineer society, they were aware of a few set parameters of society that were fixed. These are the parameters that they would have to work with and work around, because they knew that female biology is fixed and liable to do one thing on the macro scale and male biology is also fixed and liable to do other things. Any social engineering they wished to bring forth could not have been accomplished without a deep understanding of female and male nature and without a willingness to predict what should happen if you changed this or that variable in society to men and women in a way that is necessarily dependent on making broad bush generalizations of both men and women. So, what were doing in essence, by proposing things like “cultural marxism” as the main cause of feminism is saying that something falls out of your hand because you let it go, when we in fact know that something falls out of your hand because gravity accelerates it down to earth. There’s really no way around the fact, that if some sort of cultural marxist conspiracy existed, it would’ve need to work within the boundaries of fixed male and female nature to work, meaning male and female nature are what really needs to be examined and understood even if cultural marxism was a real conspiracy and if no cultural marxist plot has exited then feminism arose because of male and female nature alone. More on this later gentleman.