In terms of the masculine and feminine, let us examine the differences between the sexes from a particular point of view: Motion. I believe that everything in the Universe is made of motion. We will see how, at every level pertaining to human beings, motion is the ultimate parameter, even the languages we speak are based on ideas of motion. First and foremost, I am not a scientist nor I am an expert in any particular field: I only wish to draw attention to certain similarities which are entirely abstract. The ideas discussed below are allegorical.
The defining characteristic of spermatozoon is motility i.e. The ability of a cell to spontaneously and independently move at the cost of energy. The ovum is typically not capable of active movement: it is passed along the fallopian tubes and released to free-fall in the uterus viz. Vagility, where it is caught by the uteral lining and provided with nutrients reminiscent of sessility viz. anchored to a substrate. Both of these mobility aspects conserves energy. The spermatozoon’s brief existence consists of surviving against a hostile environment for the sole purpose of reproduction. The vaginal pH level is quite literally toxic for spermatozoa and after they make their way up the canal, they must then force themselves through the cervix and continue into the uterus to face more perils in search of the waiting ovum which in human terms is the equivalent of a man swimming 1.5 miles in acid as thick as molasses (but at least they’re good swimmers: if a spermatozoon were the size of a whale, it would propel itself at about 15 000 miles per hour.) Its life is one of unending struggle and adversity fueled by persistence and single-minded determination.
On the unitary level viz. the individual human being, we find an allegorical parallel: When our ancestors began mimicking the hunting carnivores and adapted to a semi-nomadic Hunter-Gatherer lifestyle, the division of labor between males and females consists of a unit motion similar to that of the sex cells: the males leave the home base and travel far, overcome hardship and face danger in the attacking and killing of wild animals who themselves could easily kill a human being whilst the females remain at the home base, mainly to care for their young and venture to nearby areas where they gather inferior foodstuff such as nuts, berries, leaves, roots, perhaps a wild growing vegetable and probably twigs to maintain a fire as they wait for their men to return with the days catch. One only wonders how the females would react should the hunters return empty handed on a day when the hunt provided no meat. So important was this lifestyle that the advent of agriculture hasn’t been able to displace it entirely, in fact, men have ever since been expected to leave the home, earn their survival and provide for their kin in the daily hunt for prey we call wages. He is still expected to return home like a sperm-cell eager to provide for the ovum, where his catch of a weekly pay check, already garnished by the state and on which he must pay further income tax, is surrendered to a woman who controls its distribution just as her prehistoric counterpart would carve up and cook a meaty carcass relinquished to her by the hunter before conferring the daintiest morsel upon whom she deems worthy and sets the order in which the tribe members may eat.
So men, like their elongated sperm, are outwardly oriented; their ”Meta-Motion”, so to speak, is a linear projection emanating from themselves and forward-focused in an objective, self-directed locomotion. And women, like their bulbous ova, are inwardly oriented as they are the object of motility; their ”Meta-Motion” is a linear projection emanating from all directions outside and focused subjectively on themselves.
This ”Meta-Motion” can be visualized as traces: male motion is linear: it is a forward motion and even male physical features are rectilinear in essence: from the classic square-jaw to the angled V-shape formed by broad shoulders and thin waist. Female motion is more circular: an orbital path around a central point towards which every direction points and round like the ovum which itself is a destination. Undoubtedly, curves are feminine: the storage of extra-fat around the waist, thighs and in the breasts are at the core of femininity e.g. the cliché of ”child-bearing thighs” and the unmistakable pregnant belly. Interaction also bears witness to trace ”Meta-Motion”: men usually line up in an orderly fashion whilst women prefer to bunch up in ”knitting-circles” so to speak, not unlike hens, as they need visual cues from each other’s faces to supplement verbal information. Male demeanor is described as being ”straightforward”, ”clearcut”, men are ”direct” and ”to the point” and speaking in a ”roundabout way” tends to annoy them. Also, maintaining moral forbearance is said to be keeping on the ”straight and narrow path” not unlike being ”straightedge”. Women are said to be ”radiant” or imbued with a ”Mother Earth”/Gaia spirit vaguely wafting about.
Even copulation itself fits this paradigm: the male is the transmitter and the female the receiver. The male’s reproductive organs dangle precariously below the pubis and are at constant risk. The female reproductive organs are internal, snug and safe. The transmission is accomplished in a repetitive in-and-out, back-and-forth motion wherein the man’s intromittent penis is rigidly erect in linear fashion (although slight curvature is normal) and is inserted into the woman’s vaginal canal headed toward the uterus. Most mammalian species, including all primates except humans, are endowed with an os penis named the baculum projecting an instant erection which almost represents a concrete (or perhaps calciferous) example of motion trace. The internal, hollow and curvilinear structure of the vagina-cervix-uterus-fallopian tubes suggests the subjective, enveloped and centralized motion reminiscent of female nature. Orgasmic motion also displays ”Meta-Motion” in that the male orgasm explodes a linear stream of semen headed toward a goal whilst the female orgasm consists of implosive muscle contraction. We see this simple truth even reflected in non-sexual fields from plumbing to computer hardware in that connectors are classified as male or female based on which part is inserted into which.
Let us reflect upon the analogies drawn between each sex’s cellular quintessence and the inherent behavior distinguishing men and women: Sperm is produced in the millions and a man will continue to generate sperm his whole life. The number of ova present at birth are all there will ever be and only one single ovum is released per month and lives 24 hours unfertilized maximizing its value. Male disposability is reflected in spermatozoa where their sheer volume renders each individual effectively worthless whilst gynocentrism is mirrored in the ovum’s monopolization of attention as it is the sole target of each spermatozoon’s desire. Basic economic theory suggests that the concept of female is valued more than the concept of male.
The environment acts to accommodate the passive ovum whilst it acts against the active sperm cell ensuring that the former receives only the strongest and most aggressive material from the latter or in other words: Survival of the fittest as declared by Capacitation, wherein the uterus secretes certain chemicals causing the spermatozoa strong enough to make that far to undergo their final stage of maturation and become fertile – that’s right: the millions upon millions of spermatozoa trying to reach the singular ovum aren’t even capable of reproduction until the female system has deemed them worthy which, of course, means that the overwhelming majority of spermatozoa don’t have a prayer form the begin… Those who undergo Capacitation i.e. made ”capable”, are boosted by the enzymes conferred upon them and are said to be Hyperactivated i.e. they become more aggressive swimmers ready for the acrosome reaction necessary for penetration. The arduous travails facing each spermatozoon, requiring great effort and determination, easily smacks of the hard reality each man faces in a world which thrusts them into a pitiless battle royal where every man-for-himself must gain profit at the expense of every other man and in which the loser can expect at least cold indifference and at most heartless persecution as he is scornfully cast away into oblivion. The ovum, for its part, lives a life of leisure as its progress is provided by its surroundings. It sits and waits, unaware of the trials and tribulations of its male counterpart and granting favor through Capacitation eerily reminding us of the legitimizing power of female approval as any man judged unworthy is shamed and pronounced procreatively unfit.
If by some statistics-defying twist of luck, the spermatozoon reaches the awaiting ovum, it must still knock its head against the ovum’s own barriers and aggressively invade deep within not unlike how women inexplicably behave in evasive or provocative ways as if offering a final test gauging a man’s degree of dominance by experiencing it for herself. Once successfully inside, the sperm-head releases its half of the chromosomes necessary for new life after which the spermatozoon is consumed into the substance of the fertilized zygote. Although not as directly lethal as in certain insect species, the Consumptive Misandry practiced amongst humans does lead to the deaths by suicide of many men irreparably crushed by the gynocentric system greedily consuming their resources until bled dry in the same manner as their sperm-cells disappear whilst the ovum structure remains in its new form as does the monoparental family created by the father’s replacement with the Welfare State and thus, like the embryo, the single-mother exists through male-sacrifice.
How is this allegory reflected in the respective thinking of men and women? It has long been observed that men are logical whereas women are emotional. Men argue with reason looking for evidence and searching for truth. Women argue from instinct through an ever changing premise and moral foundation based only in the present moment and contradicting itself at every turn. Again we see the ”Meta-Motions” at work: male thinking is applied outwardly on to the world with little pre-concieved notion. Just as the male is a hunter and moves about in space constantly searching, so does his curiosity and exploration trek out on the plane of cognition tracking his prey in the infinite hunting-grounds of the imagination. Female thinking is parametrized by woman’s subjective nature: her ovum-like centrality experiences the world as phenomenon coming into the origo. From the point of view of a vortex or a Black Hole, it is only natural that things should want to orbit around it until it enters, is crushed and releases whatever it may posses: it rationalizes that it must be desired and expects this behavior to continue; from this egocentric standpoint, the world can only be experienced as it appears over the horizon coming closer and closer and therefore all explanation and origin for things in the world comes not from investigation but from implication based on what a particular thing means to her: since natural phenomenon is experienced only as coming into existence fully formed and can only be related to in an egocentric way, the female mind interprets the world contentedly with itself at the center.
It is no surprize that mathematics, science, philosophy and engineering are effectively male domains. Since the male mind does not function on automatic presupposition, it is better equipped to study, investigate, experiment with, theorize on and predict natural phenomenon: a descriptive attitude concerned with finding rules in nature. The female mind concerns itself with declaration: a prescriptive attitude imposing on others whatever it wants at the time without regard for accuracy or their feelings. By its very nature, male thinking is based on freedom and all methods and ideologies which stresses the importance of freedom come from men. Female thinking, overwhelmed by emotion and egocentrism, does not bother itself with such abstract cognition as placing itself in another’s position or the idea that it may be mistaken; a woman assumes that she is the font of all regulation and disobedience is a severe affront. This is why women greatly prefer careers in Education, Advocacy, Spreading ”Awareness”, Regulatory Commissions, Administration, Human Resources, Psychology etc. Which are positions of demagoguery and arbitrary authority where, especially in Education, they enjoy creating the idea that they wield special power over the rest and their disregard for an exterior truth and the agency of others causes them to punish decent in frightful ways.
What kind of societies result from one sex predominating over the other? According to Feminist rhetoric, human history has demonstrates a preponderance of male supremacy. It is undeniably true that throughout human development, men’s natural behavior expresses itself as the kind of organization which results in civilization and that the conception and maintenance thereof cannot be achieved by women due to their natural behavior and physiology. Unable to accept this, many women choose to promote the idea that women were prohibited from participating in civilization building and have been eternal victims of male motion and not, as it seems, its prime beneficiary.
Men form linear hierarchies to efficiently assign responsibility and transmit information. Female hierarchies are more of a pecking-order for social manipulation where a central Alpha Female is surrounded by her lessers. Masculine societies have been characterized by cooperation for a higher ideal, technological advancement, epistemological and moral investigation, the efficient conducting of urban living, medical improvement and, above all, the belief in fairness and freedom; a constant drive to solve and improve creates demonstrable progress in humanity’s quality of life. Masculine virtue brings out the best in every man as praise comes solely from merit and men of all talents can contribute.A feminine society is characterized by the gaining of status over others, endless material consumption, hidden hostility, superstition, superficiality, deference, constant praising and, above all, the tyrannical imposition of unquestionable ideology. For reasons well known and discussed at length elsewhere, women seek to bring out the worst in men and castigate all men who do not fit as incapacitated regardless of their talent as their particular sphere of interest is declared shameful.
It may seem as if humanity is doomed to biological determinism with men’s deplorable state inescapable. Indeed, the very laws of physics dictate the formation and relationship of male and female motion. But Man’s story has been nothing but an endless struggle against the limitations of his biology and evolution is the greatest testament thereto. The fundamental motion of existence may provide Traditionalists with apodictic ammunition but we must not fear this: since there is no inherent reason, no preplanned objective, the fact things are the way they are does not mean that they must be so. The side-effect of consciousness endows us with the special ability to act alternatively and specifically go against our deepest instinct and this, in fact, is responsible for the progress of humanity. Of course, as in all cultures throughout history, the vast majority of people simply repeat motion; it is but a few suffering individuals who gain clearer awareness and endeavor to act upon it. At the very least, this is a lonely and bitter path but it also proves time and time again to be dangerous, for he who would swim upstream provokes a torrent against him. This is why, in my opinion, MGTOW should never engage with its detractors or operate according to public scrutiny, for it is, fundamentally, a way to live one’s life and all the debating and theorizing in the world will not cause change, for change is the result of behavior and behavior can only be performed by individuals.
I am not Nature’s slave: I will take control, for what is more masculine than self-determination?