In our previous post exploring Vigilante Justice we talked about the false rape accusation being a potent form of misandry and violence against men originating in male appropriation of women/male mother need. I’m sure though that we are aware of other methods by which the male gender can be dehumanized under the auspices of keeping women and children safe and we will discuss them here. I of course do not condone rape, but i demonstrated to you in part 1 of this post that men are more than willing to form lynch mobs, killing alleged rapists before they’ve had their day in court…just to send a message.
That message is that the safety of women is more important then the safety and freedom of potentially innocent men. In certain places in the world (India in this case) a rape accusation, even a false one, can end in a pre-trial death sentence.
This begs the question of what if any consequences does a woman in India suffer if it is found out that she falsely accused a man of rape? Will she be dragged out into the streets from her jail cell? Will she even go to jail? likely not. If an Indian woman falsely accuses an Indian man of rape, and that man in jail on these false charges is raped and killed by prison inmates. Will India riot? will western film makers produce documentaries titled “India’s Son” and will the Indian public band around this documentary if it is censored? One thing’s for sure, she certainly wont be beaten, mutilated and tortured before being murdered. This indicates to me that displays of this sort have nothing to do with sexual assault, and everything to do with protecting the sanctity of women via the brutalization of men. Never make the mistake of thinking that men organize in these lynch mobs to defend innocents against rape, they do it to defend and protect women from men. Guilt or innocence is irrelevant when you take into account that female false accusers, female rapists and female pedophiles are NEVER dragged into the streets for some good old fashioned old testament style retribution, no matter how horrible their crimes.
I bring this up so we can discard any notion of an eye for an eye mentality, I do not want us to fall into the trap of believing that this type of barbarism is just as applicable to the women of Indian society…it is not. And if we see this as a directed attack against masculinity instead of retribution for committing a crime as serious as rape, it becomes easier to understand why it is unacceptable to visit this type of vigilante justice onto men. Even IF this man did indeed rape this woman, it is STILL unacceptable to do this to him.
Men who have committed crimes of rape or pedophilia, despite the fact that you may hate them, or that their crimes are horrific, are still human beings, and justifying this type of punishment by looking the other way when we would never allow this type of punishment to be handed out to female criminals is still misandry. I am not going to allow treatment of male criminals that frankly borders on Nazi level callousness to be portrayed as acceptable in any regard.
Take for instance the male pedophile. Our entire society reviles them, and by the way, i too think that sexually abusing children is probably one of the worst crimes one can commit, but feminists and other gynocentrists have long called for the chemical castration of convicted pedophiles. Of course these convicted pedophiles are all male. We would never give a woman a forced hysterectomy, or a chemical cocktail designed to eliminate all sexual desire, ever. Feminist groups would likely call that rape, all while supporting chemical castration for men.
An excellent article demonstrating the way we treat male sexual offenders as opposed to female offenders titled the outcast at the gate can be found here. The article describes a kind of purgatory that convicted pedophiles are relegated to after serving their official prison sentence for their crimes. A relevant excerpt is given below:
The Coalinga State Hospital is a 1,500-bed facility that sits on an arid plain near the geographic center of California, far from any major cities. Its isolation is telling. Set behind imposing fences that bear a likeness to those of Pleasant Valley State Prison, just next door, Coalinga, which opened in 2005 at a cost of nearly $400 million, is where the state houses its most dangerous male sexual offenders after they have served time in prison.
When the state of California deems a prisoner who has committed certain violent sex crimes likely to re-offend upon his release, the courts can commit him to Coalinga for an indeterminate length of time. If he ever wishes to be set free, a patient there can mount a legal challenge to his commitment or choose to undergo a rigorous course of therapy and testing. In the latter scenario, the hospital uses various tools to ascertain the likelihood of his re-offending, including actuarial risk assessments and phallometric testing, which measures blood flow to the penis when patients are exposed to sexual imagery. Many patients decline to run this gauntlet. Life at Coalinga has its comforts, among them a common area with a barbershop and a restaurant called the Patient Mall. Patients can also take classes in badminton, ceramics, and art therapy. But a gilded cage is still a cage, and some patients are determined to secure their release.
Now ask yourselves… would we ever hook female pedophiles up to machines to measure gynometric reactions or vaginal lubrication to decide if she’s still attracted to young children? Our society barely even sees women having sex with under aged boys as a crime. We will explore this further and in more detail in future posts. For now i hope i’ve given you some food for thought.